SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: HPilot who wrote (19685)1/17/2008 10:21:10 AM
From: neolib  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 36921
 
Joules, Watts, HP are the most common

Those are not the same type of units.

But usually Watts or HP as work is usually measured as a rate, but you can't even explain this.

That is as stupid as saying that distance (m, ft, etc) can just as well be measured as a rate (m/s or ft/s). Hello, distance and velocity are two different things. So are Work and Power.

Do you seriously think anyone would bother to try and discuss any fine point of AGW with you when you are so dense on such a simple thing as the above?



To: HPilot who wrote (19685)1/18/2008 1:50:43 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 36921
 
What do you think is the cause of any A and AGW. All analysis I have made of CO2 and it's properties, mass, specific heat, adsorption spectrum along with other molecules that make up air show a miniscule tendency toward CO2 causing cooling and not heating.