Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Rat's Nest - Chronicles of Collapse -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (6944)	1/18/2008 5:44:46 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24225

Cellulosic ethanol: It might be a bust Thus spake Chairman Peterson of the House Ag Committee Posted by Tom Philpott at 11:28 AM on 17 Jan 2008 David already pointed to it, but it bears repeating: House Ag Committee Chairman Colin Peterson, a tireless champion of ethanol and any other big-ag project he can get his mits on, has declared that cellulosic ethanol could well never "get off the ground." At best, he declared, cellulosic ethanol stands at least 10 years away from commercial viability (exactly what cellulosic boosters have been saying for three decades). Wait a minute. Ethanol's champions have long claimed that we should indulge corn-based ethanol its obvious weaknesses, because the corn-based brew is a mere bridge fuel to the real environmental panacea: cellulosic ethanol. Over its 30-year run as a major "alternative fuel," ethanol has enjoyed two constant champions. One is the U.S. Congress, particularly its farm-belt members; the other is the USDA, the federal agency through which Congress funnels much of its ethanol largesse. Last September, the USDA expressed what I considered to be shocking pessimism about cellulosic's promise: it held that while the technology offered "some longer-term promise" ("some"?), we shouldn't hold our breath for any major breakthroughs before 2013. Now we get Peterson's bleak pronouncements. If cellulosic ethanol is a bust, maybe we should stop dropping $5.5-$7.3 billion a year -- and causing all manner of ecological havoc -- propping up what's supposed to be its bridge, corn ethanol? I wonder what Vinod Khosla thinks about this. gristmill.grist.org