Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (27997)	1/20/2008 9:37:09 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218083

Perhaps in an academic sense they might say they are at war, but that's a bit like north and south Korea being at war. They aren't really. Neither do they really think of themselves as at war, even if they say they are. People at war would be a lot more circumspect about moving capital and self into the enemy's territory. It's more like The Cold War = perhaps at war in a sense. But the cold war included actual wars via proxies [as in Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Cuba etc]. Taiwan and China are more like OZ/NZ. There's no real need for fighting. There are plenty of ways to get along. The land mass isn't going anywhere. Devolution can come and go to a greater or lesser extent and a shrug is a better response than explosives. Mqurice