SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (19749)1/21/2008 6:40:13 PM
From: maceng2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36921
 
but its also a fantasy on your point

Really? No one is saying that only America and a few other countries know how to measure temperature.???????

Lets read this piece of trash again...

antigreen.blogspot.com

Guess what. Almost all the socioeconomic variables were important. We found the data were of highest quality in North America and that they were very contaminated in Africa and South America. Overall, we found that the socioeconomic biases "likely add up to a net warming bias at the global level that may explain as much as half the observed land-based warming trend."

We then modified IPCC's temperature data for these biases and compared the statistical distribution of the warming to the original IPCC data and to satellite measures of lower atmospheric temperature that have been available since 1979. Since these are from a single source (the U.S. government), and they don't have any urban contamination, they are likely to be affected very little by economic factors.


So, a country that is more dependent on using oil then any other country, the biggest consumer of energy by far, is the only country that should be trusted to evaluating whether said energy consumption is effecting the climate or not?!

The Bureau of Labor Statistics springs to mind for some reason.

and you think I'm the guy living in fantasy land? wow!

as regarding your other questions, read the reports by the IPCC bearing in mind that all the numbers are low balled and best guestimates only.