SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bentway who wrote (367671)1/21/2008 12:35:16 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575775
 
Indeed, while the economy is sending mixed messages about growth, the signs of increasing inflation are flashing bright red. For 2007 the consumer price index rose 4.1%, the biggest annual increase in 17 years. Gold, historically a reliable harbinger of inflation, set an all-time high of more than $900 an ounce. The dollar is languishing at a record low against the euro and a weighted basket of international currencies. "Flooding the market with liquidity is a disaster for the purchasing power of the dollar," says David Gitlitz, chief economist for Trend Macrolytics.

That's true.....lowering the interest rates further will weaken the dollar further. Now let's look at what that means. It will be more expensive for people when they travel overseas. Do you care, I don't.....and I want to go to Europe in the next year. US assets will be cheaper....encouraging foreign investors to buy them. I am never comfortable with foreign investment but its hardly the end of the world. It will make US products and services cheaper. Now how can that be bad.

The Fed's supporters tend to downplay those dangers. They contend that the inflation surge is being driven largely by energy costs. Since oil isn't likely to rise from its near-$100 level, inflation is likely to tail off in 2008. "That argument is wrong," says Brian Wesbury, chief economist with First Trust Portfolios, an asset-management firm.

We get Bush out of the White House, I bet the contango effect on oil will be reduced by at least another $10. In other words, its looking more and more like oil has 'topped' for now.

"As people spend less to drive to the golf course, they will spend the extra money on golf clubs or other products. The Fed wants to reflate the economy, so the money that went into higher oil prices will drive up the prices of other goods."

What an absurd premise....they save $30 in fuel and they're going to run out and buy a bunch of DVDs or CDs. I thought the American consumer was strapped. Reducing fuel costs will allow them to catch up on their bills.

Fed supporters also point out that the yield on ten-year Treasury bonds stands at just 3.8%, a figure that implies that investors expect inflation to be around 2% in future years. So if inflation is really expected to rage, why aren't interest rates far higher? The explanation is twofold. First, government bonds are hardly a foolproof forecaster. For example, five years ago Treasury yields were predicting 2% inflation over the next five years, and the actual figure was 3%, or 50% higher.

Oh give me a break......as if anyone is complaining about 3% inflation.

Second, investors are so skittish about most stocks and corporate bonds that they're paying a huge premium for safe investments, chiefly U.S. Treasuries. "It's all about a flight to safety," says Meltzer. Stand by for a major rise in yields as the reality of looming inflation sinks in.

Meltzer has been saying that all year as the yield on Treasuries keeps dropping. We're waiting, Mr. Meltzer.

So what is the right course for the Fed? Bernanke should hold the Fed funds rate exactly where it is now, at 4.25%. Standing pat might well push the economy into a recession. But the Fed's newfound vigilance on inflation would boost the dollar, effectively lowering the prices of oil and other imports. America would suffer a short downturn and restore price stability, paving the way to a strong recovery in 2010 or 2011.

Sadly, the Fed has already chosen sides. It's likely to lower rates every time growth slows or joblessness rises. As a result, it will never tame inflation until it becomes a clawing, bellowing threat. Then we'll have to suffer a real recession, the kind we suffered in the aftermath of a time we should study and shouldn't forget - the 1970s.


I see.......when the inflation rate is lowered to 1-2-3%, we really aren't taming inflation. Instead we have to do what doctors did when they didn't have many options for treating cancer......we have to enter into the system a poison/chemo [do nothing] hoping that it will kill the cancer [inflation]
and not the patient [the economy]. No thanks. They did that with my father.....he died.



To: bentway who wrote (367671)1/21/2008 12:45:09 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575775
 
Here Comes the Panic

By Jim Cramer
RealMoney.com Columnist

It's here. The panic that comes when the central banks get it all wrong and the recession talk begins to seep worldwide.

This is the self-fulfilling moment when we all recognize that any hopes we pinned on central bankers looks misplaced and the bears growl worldwide.


I know domestically it makes some sense. I say some, because when you see the strong report from a company like GE (GE - commentary - Cramer's Take - Rating) you have to wonder whether all of this could have been prevented by swift action and large cuts when it was still easy to prevent.

Remember our crisis here involved only housing. The rest of the world was strong. Had we cut aggressively to move the real estate overhang -- people still need homes! -- we had a shot but now it appears too late.

What's the domino play? We know that what's left on the banks sheets after the selling is paper that looks like AAA but is actually lower because a lot of it was BBB but was enhanced by insurance that really isn't going to hold up so will instantly be downgraded to BBB where it will have to be sold by a great many institutions that insist on their holdings being all AAA. When that happens the glut will be catastrophic and the sell-off awful.


While in the end it is only $400 billion in paper that is at risk, much of it is really is at risk with no hedge and when it goes there will be financial chaos, even though only a portion of it is really toxic.

There is no plan to save the monolines, which would allow some of the insurance to make it so the bonds that the not great residential mortgage paper backs defaults. We have Darwinists in treasury and the Fed who truly believe that it won't matter.

I often wonder if they are right and if we just crunch it all whether we can recover in a year and start over better than we were. But in the interim we simply can't handle that level of downgrades all at once and the agencies will have to downgrade without the patina of the insurance.

It is too bad because if no one had to react it could be run-off. If the holders were all like AIG (AIG - commentary - Cramer's Take - Rating) instead of the real at- risk institutions like Citigroup (C - commentary - Cramer's Take - Rating) or Merrill (MER - commentary - Cramer's Take - Rating) or Bank of America (BAC - commentary - Cramer's Take - Rating) or Wachovia (WB - commentary - Cramer's Take - Rating) we could plod.

But right now we can't.

And what we are left with is financial chaos that will force the banks to stop lending so that it doesn't even matter where the rates are.

That's why I believe this sell-off in equities must occur even though it is totally unwarranted and could have been dealt with before and still could if we put in place a plan to bail out the monoline policies, no matter how flimsy, to make it so we are more AIG-like than Wachovia or Bank of America like.


Make no mistake about it, when looking at the portfolios generated by Ameriquest, New Century, Fremont and Countrywide -- the paper that is choking the system -- there are several hundred billion in losses still unaccounted for.

But it could come to a head real soon with the downgrades of the monolines (PMI/MGIC on the personal mortgage and MBIA and AMBAK on the structured issues) and the report on Bank of America. I genuinely believe now that is BAC has to take delivery of Countrywide's bad loans, it will take BAC down with it.

Yes, it can be that bad.