SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (20519)1/23/2008 1:13:54 AM
From: Hope Praytochange  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224750
 
John Mark Deutch (born July 27, 1938) is an American chemist and civil servant. He was the United States Deputy Secretary of Defense from 1994 to 1995 and Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) from May 10, 1995 until December 14, 1996. He is presently an Institute Professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and serves on the Board of Directors of Citigroup, Cummins, Raytheon, and Schlumberger Ltd.

Contents [hide]
1 Background
2 CIA career
3 See also
4 Sources
5 External links


[edit] Background
Deutch was born in Brussels, Belgium, to a Russian Jewish father. He graduated from the Sidwell Friends School in Washington, DC and earned a bachelor's degree in History and Economics from Amherst College. In 1961, he earned an B.S. degree in Chemical Engineering and, in 1966, he earned a PhD in Chemistry, both from MIT. He holds honorary degrees from Amherst College, University of Massachusetts at Lowell, and Northeastern University. From 1977 to 1980, he served in several positions for the U.S. Department of Energy: as Director of Energy Research, Acting Assistant Secretary for Energy Technology, and Undersecretary of the Department. He continued to serve on various government committees throughout the 1980s and early 1990s. He served as the provost of MIT from 1985 - 1990.

[edit] CIA career
In 1995, President Bill Clinton appointed him Director of Central Intelligence (cabinet rank in the Clinton administration). However, Deutch was initially reluctant to accept the appointment. As head of the CIA, Deutch continued the policy of his predecessor R. James Woolsey to declassify records pertaining to U.S. covert operations during the Cold War.[1] He put restraints on what he considered to be politically incorrect agent recruitment and sought to encourage more diversity at the Agency in order to include more women and minorities in its ranks.[2]

Soon after Deutch's departure from the CIA in 1996 it was revealed that classified materials were being kept on several of Deutch's laptop computers designated as unclassified. In January of 1997, the CIA began a formal security investigation of the matter. Senior management at CIA declined to fully pursue the security breach. Over two years after his departure, the matter was referred to the Department of Justice, where Attorney General Janet Reno declined prosecution. She did, however, recommend an investigation to determine whether Deutch should retain his security clearance.[3] President Clinton pardoned Deutch on his last day in office.[4]

[edit] See alsohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Deutch



To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (20519)1/23/2008 1:16:52 AM
From: Hope Praytochange  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224750
 
1995
June


John DeutchSometime in June, a walk-in agent for PRC intelligence services approached the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) office in Taiwan and provided them with an official PRC document classified "Secret" that contained design information of all seven of America's nuclear warheads.[1] Clinton's Director of Central Intelligence John Deutch was informed the following month.[2]
July

Clinton's former Energy Secretary Hazel O'Leary, Chief of Staff Leon Panetta, and Deputy Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet learned of the PRC's theft of America's nuclear warhead designs sometime in July 1995, but did not inform the President at that time.[3]
October

On or about October 31, the FBI first learned of the PRC's possible theft of advanced U.S. nuclear weapons designs.[4]
November


Anthony Lake (left) with President Clinton and Leon PanettaCIA Director Deutch informed Clinton's National Security Adviser Anthony Lake about the PRC's theft of America's nuclear weapon designs sometime in November 1995. The president was not briefed at that time.[3]
In late 1995 and early 1996, United States Department of Energy (DOE) intelligence official Notra Trulock took his findings on the PRC's theft of advanced U.S. nuclear warhead designs to the FBI. Trulock made the discovery independently from the CIA while analyzing data from the PRC's recent underground nuclear test. A team of FBI and DOE officials then traveled to three weapons labs (Livermore, Sandia and Los Alamos) and pored over travel and work records of lab scientists who had access to the relevant technology. By February, they narrowed its focus to five possible suspects.[2]

[edit] 1996
In early 1996, Notra Trulock told CIA officials about his discoveries on the PRC's theft of America's nuclear warhead designs.[2]
February


A model of a typical satelliteOn February 14, a People's Liberation Army (PLA) space launch vehicle crashed destroying the Loral Space & Communications satellite it was carrying. PRC officials kept American investigators away from the crash scene. When they were finally allowed access, they found the militarily sensitive encryption chips were missing even though their encasing was left intact (encryption technology denies outsiders access to, or control over, American satellites in space).[5] Loral and Hughes Electronics' engineers were accused of giving missile secrets to China in the ensuing investigation of the launch failure.[6][7][8][9]
March

On March 27, Energy Department officials were notified by an American agent that it appeared the PRC recently stole U.S. neutron bomb secrets.[10]
April

Sometime in April 1996, intelligence analyst Ronald Pandolfi wrote a report for the CIA warning about military implications of Hughes Electronics' sharing of missile expertise with the PRC. The CIA decided not to distribute the classified report to select government officials, as is routinely done with intelligence estimates, saying it was insufficiently rigorous. The report would be kept from Congress until late 1998.[11]

Samuel "Sandy" BergerOn April 13, the Energy Department briefed the White House about the PRC's espionage at Los Alamos weapons lab. A group of senior officials including Notra Trulock met with Deputy National Security Advisor Sandy Berger and told him that the PRC appeared to have acquired both W-88 nuclear and neutron bomb secrets and that a spy for the PRC might still be at Los Alamos. Berger later stated he did not inform the president of the espionage until July 1997,[2] but did inform Congress in April 1996[3] The Energy Department also notified Defense Secretary Perry, Attorney General Janet Reno, and FBI Director Louis Freeh about China's alleged espionage during this same time period. Allegedly, no one informed the president.[12]
Sometime in April, Vice President Al Gore's national security advisor Leon Fuerth was informed about the PRC's nuclear espionage at America's weapons laboratories. Some documents showed he may have been informed as early as 1995, though Fuerth did not recall a briefing then. Fuerth did not mention the espionage to Gore until March 1999.[13]
May

On May 30, the FBI formally opened a criminal investigation into the theft of the W-88 nuclear design. Originally only 1 or 2 agents were assigned to the case and the inquiry made little progress over the rest of the year.[3]
June

In late June or early July, the CIA issued an internal government statement that declared they may have misread their original analysis of the documents delivered by the double agent to their Taiwan offices and that China may not have America's weapons designs after all. The FBI, in turn, suspended their investigation of the matter (which had just started) for about six weeks.[3]

[edit] 1997
Sometime in early 1997, Energy Department intelligence analyst Notra Trulock learned of new nuclear espionage evidence. He attempted to contact newly appointed Energy Secretary Federico Peña about the information but was not given an appointment to see him until July.[2]
April

The FBI issued a classified report that recommended background checks on foreign visitors to nuclear laboratories be reinstated. The Energy Department ignored the recommendations for 17 months.[2]
May

In May 1997, Los Alamos laboratory scientist Wen Ho Lee (a suspect since February 1996 in the FBI's investigation of China's nuclear espionage campaign) was promoted to a position that required an even higher security clearance than he already had. The Justice Department repeatedly refused FBI requests to tap Wen Ho Lee's phone and gain access to his computer over the next few months.[14] Lee pleaded guilty September 13, 2000 to a single charge of mishandling nuclear secrets after most other charges were dropped.[15]
Attorney General Janet RenoFormer Sandia and Los Alamos laboratory employee Peter Lee (no relation to Wen Ho Lee) gave top secret information on antisubmarine radar technology away to Chinese nuclear-weapons experts during a May 11 lecture at the Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics in Beijing, China. Attorney General Reno and Clinton's Navy Department later refused FBI requests to allow open-court testimony about the technology even though doing so would kill the FBI's espionage case against him. Lee ended up pleading guilty to filing a false statement about his 1997 trip to China and to giving classified laser data to Chinese scientists during an earlier trip to China in 1985.[16]
July

Sometime in July, Secretary Peña met with Notra Trulock who had new information about China's ongoing espionage at America's nuclear weapons laboratories. After the meeting, Peña sent him to see National Security Advisor Sandy Berger.[2] Trulock then briefed Berger. Afterwards, Berger then briefed President Clinton about China's nuclear espionage campaign for the first time.[2]
August

Sandy Berger went to China August 10.[17] Before he left, he assigned his NSC aide in charge of proliferation to assess the nuclear espionage situation. The aide later stated that, while the espionage had taken place, Trulock's briefing was only a worst-case scenario.[2]
September


FBI Director Louis FreehSometime in September, FBI Director Louis Freeh recommended the Energy Department fire nuclear scientist Wen Ho Lee. They ignored his recommendation for 18 months.[18]
On September 12, the Washington Post reported the FBI, National Security Agency, and CIA identified Ted Sioeng, a political fundraiser for Republicans and Democrats, as a Chinese spy.[19]
Also in September, Attorney General Reno opened a criminal investigation into Loral Space & Communications and Hughes Electronics' illegal transfer of ballistic missile technology to China.
October

On October 29, President Clinton certified that China was not engaging in the export of nuclear technology to non-nuclear nations, which allowed a 1985 Sino-U.S. nuclear cooperation agreement to go into effect in 1998. The agreement allowed for the shipping of nuclear power plant technology to China.[20] "This agreement is a win-win," Clinton said. "It serves America's national security, environmental and economic interests… It is the right thing to do for America."[21]
November


PRC President Jiang ZeminPRC President Jiang Zemin completed his tour of the United States with a November 2-3 visit to Los Angeles. While there, he toured Hughes Electronics' main headquarters and manufacturing plant.[22] Hughes Electronics was fined $32 million in 2003 for illegally transferring missile technology to China in 1995.[23]
On November 7, 1998, Energy Secretary Federico Peña announced the department had taken actions to strengthen the safeguards and security at the department's defense nuclear facilities. In announcing the actions, Peña released two reports he said he had ordered earlier in the year on safeguards and security. "Several months ago when security concerns were first brought to my attention, I ordered these reports. Today, I am publicly releasing them because I think we have a responsibility to the American people to address these challenges as openly and directly as possible. More importantly, we are taking actions to further secure our facilities," Peña said.[24]

[edit] 1998
February

President Clinton authorized the sale to China of a Loral-made satellite sometime in February 1998. Justice Department prosecutors who were investigating the company for possible violations of export law regarding the February 1996 failed rocket launch in China opposed this.[25] Loral was eventually fined $14 million in 2002 for its involvement in illegally transferring missile technology to China.[7]
Also in February, President Clinton issued a Presidential Decision Directive (PDD-61) that attempted to tighten security in all of the United States' weapons laboratories. The PDD also ordered the Department of Energy to establish a stronger counterintelligence program. The exact text of the PDD is unknown as it has never been publicly released.[26]
June

On June 18, the House of Representatives voted 409-10 to allow the creation of a special committee to investigate whether technology or information was transferred to the People's Republic of China that may have contributed­ to the enhancement of their nuclear-armed intercontinental ballistic missiles. The committee was named the Select Committee on U.S. National Security and Military/Commercial Concerns with the People's Republic of China.[27]
October

On October 17, President Clinton signed into law recently passed legislation by Congress that reversed his 1996 Executive Order that shifted control over commercial satellite exports permits from the State Department to the Commerce Department. After signing the bill, President Clinton stated the change was: "...not necessary... and could hamper the U.S. satellite industry." The legislation would not go into effect until five months later.[28]
December

On December 5, The New York Times reported the Justice Department was investigating the Central Intelligence Agency for possibly obstructing justice by giving Hughes Electronics information about the House Select Committee's investigation of the company.[29]

[edit] 1999
January

On January 3, the House Select Committee on U.S. National Security and Military/Commercial Concerns with the People's Republic of China released their classified report on their findings regarding China's espionage campaign against the United States to government officials in Congress and the White House.
March

Sometime in March, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright and Vice President Al Gore learned of China's thefts of America's weapons designs for the first time.[13]
On March 6, The New York Times published an article entitled "China Stole Nuclear Secrets From Los Alamos, U.S. Officials Say". The article publicly detailed for the first time the government's belief China had stolen classified information on the W-88 nuclear warhead. [2]
The Energy Department fired nuclear scientist Wen Ho Lee on March 8, 1999. FBI Director Louis Freeh recommended Lee be fired 18 months earlier.[18]
U.S. Rep. Chris CoxMay

On May 25, the United States House of Representatives released the unanimously agreed upon Cox Report (AKA Report of the Select Committee on U.S. National Security and Military/Commercial Concerns with the People's Republic of China) which detailed publicly for the first time China's espionage campaign against the United States. The report was a redacted version of a still-classified report completed almost five months previously. President Clinton and his CIA determined 30 percent of the original report could not be released to the public.[30]
Excerpt from an interview with National Security Advisor Sandy Berger by Jim Lehrer of PBS May 27, 1999:
Lehrer: The main hit on you, as you know, Mr. Berger, is that you were told (about China's nuclear espionage) in April of 1996 and you didn't tell the president about it until, what, a year or so later, even longer than that?

Berger: I was told in 1996, Jim, of the... at a briefing, of the evolution of China's strategic program, in two cases, one went back to 1979. The one that went that went to... involved in the mid-80's. I found that very troubling. I asked DOE... I acted in response to what I heard. I asked DOE to widen and deepen its investigation, to intensify as they were planning their counterintelligence efforts to brief the Congress[.] [W]ithin several weeks the FBI had opened up a full investigation on the prime suspect. So I took the actions that I believe were appropriate. I get an awful lot of threat information every day. I have to make a judgment as to what I brief the president on and what I don't. In 1997, when this was clearly a pattern and a systemic problem, I thought it was essential for the president to know.[31]

December

In December 1999, four Stanford University professors release a report rebutting the Cox Commission, noting "The language of the report, particularly its Overview, was inflammatory and some allegations did not seem to be well supported....Some important and relevant facts are wrong and a number of conclusions are, in our view, unwarranted." A number of other reports, including one from the National Academy of Sciences, reach similar conclusions. [1].

[edit] Notes and references
^ Report of the Select Committee on U.S. National Security and Military/Commercial Concerns with the People's Republic of China, Chapter 2, The "Walk-In", U.S. House of Representatives, Retrieved: April 14, 2006
^ a b c d e f g h i j Gerth, Jeff and Risen, James, "China Stole Nuclear Secrets From Los Alamos, U.S. Officials Say", New York Times, March 6, 1999
^ a b c d e Risen, James and Gerth, Jeff, "U.S. Is Said to Have Known Of China Spy Link in 1995", New York Times, June 27, 1999
^ Department of Energy, FBI, and Department of Justice Handling of the Espionage Investigation into the Compromise of Design Information on the W-88 Warhead Statement by Senate Governmental Affairs Committee, Aug. 5, 1999, Retrieved: May 29, 2006
^ Shmitt, Eric, "A Secret U.S. Device Missing After '96 China Rocket Crash", New York Times, June 24, 1998
^ "Loral CEO frequent administration guest", Associated Press, May 21, 1998
^ a b Mintz, John, "2 U.S. space giants accused of aiding China Hughes, Boeing allegedly gave away missile technology illegally", Washington Post, Jan. 1, 2003
^ "Boeing, Hughes settle technology transfer charges", Associated Press, March 6, 2003
^ "Chinese Aerospace Official Denies Giving To Dems", CNN.com, May 21, 1998
^ Gerth, Jeff and Risen, James, "Intelligence Report Points To 2d China Nuclear Leak", New York Times, April 8, 1999
^ Gerth, Jeff, "Old Concerns Over Data Transfer to China Get New Attention", New York Times, Dec. 7, 1998
^ Select Committee on U.S. National Security and Military/Commericial Concerns with the People's Republic of China, Chapter 2, Notification of the President and Senior U.S. Officials, Retrieved: June 2, 2006
^ a b Gerth, Jeff, "China Stole Data, Report Concludes", New York Times, May 21, 1999
^ Risen, James, "Though Suspected as China Spy, Scientist Got Sensitive Job at Lab", New York Times, March 24, 1999
^ Sterngold, James, "Nuclear Scientist Set Free After Plea in Secrets Case; Judge Attacks U.S. Conduct", New York Times, Sep. 14, 2000
^ Gerth, Jeff and Risen, James, "Reports Show Scientist Gave U.S. Radar Secrets to Chinese", New York Times, May 10, 1999
^ Almanac, CNN.com, Aug. 10, 1997
^ a b Risen, James, "U.S. Fires Scientist Suspected Of Giving China Bomb Data", New York Times, March 9, 1999
^ Woodward, Bob and Duffy, Brian, "Senate Panel Is Briefed on China Probe Figure", Washington Post, Sept. 12,1997
^ Diamond, Howard, "Clinton Moves to Implement Sino-U.S. Nuclear Agreement", Arms Control Today, January/February 1998
^ "Clinton OKs Nuclear Power Sales To China", CNN.com, Oct. 29, 1997
^ Purdum, Todd S., "Jiang Does Business On Last Stop Of U.S. Visit", New York Times, Nov. 3, 1997
^ Gerth, Jeff, "2 Companies Pay Penalties For Improving China Rockets", New York Times, March 6, 2003
^ "Peña Takes Action to Boost Security at DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities", DOE Press Release, Nov. 7, 1998, Retrieved June 8, 2006
^ Gerth, Jeff, "Reports Show Chinese Military Used American-Made Satellites", New York Times, June 13, 1998
^ Federation of American Scientists website, Retrieved: June 7, 2006
^ House Resolution 463, Library of Congress Thomas website, Retrieved: June 6, 2006
^ "Congress Returns Export Control Over Satellites to State Department", Arms Control Association, October 1998, Retrieved: June 8, 2006
^ Stout, David, "C.I.A. Is Focus of Inquiry in China Rocket Case", New York Times, Dec. 5, 1998
^ "Report: China stole U.S. nuke secrets to 'fulfill international agenda'", CNN.com, May 25, 1999
^ Transcript, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, PBS, May 27, 1999, Retrieved: May 27, 2006

[edit] External links
1997 (U.S. Senate) Special Investigation in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns: Final Report (PDF files)
NewsMax October 1999 article "Can We Buy Back Our Supercomputer, Please? - Sandia nuclear laboratory may have to explain why"
Congressional Research Service report "China: Suspected Acquisition of U.S. Nuclear Weapon Secrets"
The Report of the Select Committee on U.S. National Security and Military/Commercial Concerns with the People's Republic of China (AKA Cox Report)
Fox News "Iowa Republican Demands Tighter Nuclear Lab Security"
Copy of official Charles La Bella memo to Janet Reno
Copy of official Louis Freeh memo to Janet Reno
U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
The Cox Committee Report: An Assessment
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_Cox_Report_controversy"
Categories: Sino-American relations | Timelines of recent events | Clinton administration controversies
ViewsArticle Discussion Edit this page History Personal toolsSign in / create account Navigation
Main Page
Contents
Featured content

This page was last modified 15:48, 8 January 2008. All text



To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (20519)1/23/2008 1:18:59 AM
From: Hope Praytochange  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224750
 
Susan McDougal (born 1955 in Heidelberg, Germany) is one of the few people who served prison time as a result of the Whitewater controversy in the United States, though fifteen individuals were convicted of federal charges. She is most notorious for refusing to answer "three questions" for a grand jury about whether President Bill Clinton lied in his testimony during her Whitewater trial. Her refusal lead to 18 months jail time for contempt of court, which was most of her total 22 months of incarceration. McDougal received a full Presidential pardon from outgoing President Clinton in the final hours of his presidency in 2001.



To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (20519)1/23/2008 1:21:38 AM
From: Hope Praytochange  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224750
 
Samuel Loring Morison (born October 30, 1944) is a former American intelligence professional, convicted of espionage and theft of government property in 1985, and pardoned by President Clinton in 2001.

Morison earned $5,000 per year as a part-time contributor and editor of the American section of the London-based Jane's Fighting Ships, an annual reference work on the world's navies. There were repeated complaints about Morison using U.S. Navy office time and facilities to do his work for Jane's and warnings to him about conflict of interest between the jobs.[citation needed]

Conflicts with his supervisors led Morison to seek a full-time position with Jane's in London. At this time, he began overstepping the boundary of permissible information that could be sent to Jane's. As a GS-12 Soviet amphibious ship analyst with a Top Secret clearance, Morison provided Jane's with three Secret satellite photographs that he had taken in July 1984, from the desk of a coworker at NISC. The classified control markings were cut away by Morison before mailing them to Jane's.


This 1984 computer-enhanced, oblique-angle KH-11 photo was leaked along with two others to Jane's Defence Weekly by naval intelligence analyst Samuel Loring Morison. The image shows the general layout of the Nikolaiev 444 shipyard in the Black Sea. Under construction is a Kiev-class aircraft carrier, left, then known as the Kharkov, along with an amphibious landing ship.In 1984, two images of Soviet aircraft, taken by a KH-8 or KH-9 satellite, were inadvertently published in Congressional hearings. That same year, Jane's Defence Weekly was provided with several images taken by a KH-11 satellite of a Soviet naval shipbuilding facility. The 1984 computer enhanced KH-11 photo (pictured at the right), taken at an oblique angle was leaked, along with two others, to Jane's Defence Weekly. The image shows the general layout of the Nikolaiev 444 shipyard in the Black Sea. Under construction is a Kiev class aircraft carrier (shown in the left side of the photo), then known as the Kharkov, along with an amphibious landing ship.

A joint investigation by the Naval Investigative Service and the FBI led to Morison, resulting in his arrest on October 1, 1984. A search of Morison’s apartment in Crofton, Maryland, revealed several hundred government documents. Some of the documents were classified. Investigations of this incident never revealed any intent to provide information to a hostile intelligence service. Morison was charged with espionage and theft of government property. During interrogation Morison revealed that the reason he sent the photographs to Jane’s was because the "public should be aware of what was going on on the other side" and that "if the American people knew what the Soviets were doing, they would increase the defense budget." On October 17 1985 and Morison was found guilty in Federal Court of the charges and on December 4 1985, was sentenced to two years in prison.

Morison believed that the new nuclear-powered aircraft carrier would transform Soviet capabilities and therefore had a political motive for passing classified information to the media -- to influence American public opinion in favor of a stronger defense posture.

As a result of the Morison case, policy guidelines for adjudicating security clearances were changed to include consideration of outside activities that present potential conflict of interest.

During the 1980s, there have been a number of inadvertent or unauthorized disclosures of U.S. satellite imagery. In 1980, as a result of the fiasco at Desert One, KH-11 imagery of possible evacuation sites in Tehran was left behind. In 1981, Aviation Week & Space Technology published a leaked (and degraded) KH-11 photo of a Soviet bomber at Ramenskoye Airfield. In 1984, two images of Soviet aircraft taken by a KH-8 or KH-9 satellite were published, apparently by mistake, in the (thought to be) sanitized version of the Congressional hearings released to the public. None of these cases resulted in convictions.

In 1998, in a letter from Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan asked for appeal on the grounds of "the erratic application of that law and the anomaly of this singular conviction in eighty-one years". He cited examples of VENONA and Theodore Hall as serious espionage cases that were not pursued and Daniel Ellsberg and Anthony Russo whose serious cases were dismissed. On January 20, 2001 President Clinton pardoned Morison.