Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: octavian who wrote (34180)	1/22/2008 7:37:28 PM
From: queenleah	Respond to of 42834

Octavian said to honey: <<--You simply don't have enough evidence to conclude that queen lied. You should not accuse people of lying unless you know for an absolute fact that they are lying.>> And the truth is, octavian, I didn't accuse her of anything in the first place. I asked a question. They sure flew off the handle, especially Kirk, which leads me to suspect at least one guilty conscience. Hooray for honey for deleting it, but it sounds like it was there at least long enough for anyone who wanted to, to copy it and disseminate it. But Honey apparently concluded from my question that I "knew" the Brinker special bulletin was going to be posted on her blog. Sorry, but I don't believe the "damage control" story about the Brinker bulletin being posted by someone affiliated with or supporting Brinker, not for one second. I don't know anything about honey's blog, but the story sounds a lot like other conspiracy myths we've heard from that direction when they are caught at something. I'm not saying honey knew about it either, because I don't know. But the whole "I don't know who did it, but I think it was Brinker's side just trying to get us in trouble" sounds just a whole lot like after-the-fact damage control, spin and blame-shifting to me. And like you, I can't understand how they could NOT know what ID posted it. The whole story stinks.

To: octavian who wrote (34180)	1/22/2008 7:48:44 PM
From: yaetmo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

Octavian, The scumbag poster used Fish's real name for the alias.

To: octavian who wrote (34180)	1/22/2008 8:04:04 PM
From: Honey_Bee	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42834

Octavian said: "--You simply don't have enough evidence to conclude that queen lied. You should not accuse people of lying unless you know for an absolute fact that they are lying. Here is what I said to queen: "However, I think you knew it was going to be posted on my Blog because earlier today, you accused me of posting a quote from it which was a lie." Excuse me, Octavian, I worded that badly (but I know that queen understood me). Let me word it in a more simple way for you: It was not true that I had posted a quote from the bulletin--which queen had accused me of doing... .

To: octavian who wrote (34180)	1/22/2008 8:22:45 PM
From: Honey_Bee	Respond to of 42834

Octavian said: "Honey, you MUST know who posted it. Wasn't there a name (an alias) on the post? No, Octavian...I have no way of knowing the identity of who posted the illegal copyrighted material on my Blog. I am not a computer expert. HOWEVER, I have posted a warning on my Blog, advising anyone who might think of doing it again, that I will (temporarily), not delete it, but will immediately report it to Bob Brinker and to Google--so THEY can investigate if they want. I'm sure they have easy means to discover identities of posters, no matter what handle they use. . Octavian asked: "Apparently you're saying you didn't recognize the alias. Can anyone just go to your board and post? I thought you had to register, and THEN get "approved" by you or kirk in order to post." Octavian, why do you make me waste so much time repeatedly answering your questions? I explained all of this to you last night on our Google Group. Yes, anyone can post a comment. (Right now anyway, if the abusive garbage continues, I may have to change that, but I would tell you.) No, you do not have to register and be "approved" by anybody. But if that were the case, it would be me....it is my Blog. Kirk set it up for me and advertises on it and occasionally posts some helpful graphs, etc., but it is MY BLOG! Can you remember that? . Octavian said: "Surely this alias at least registered, which would give you some idea who he is, wouldn't it?" See my first paragraph above!! Then take a screen shot of all of this post, save it, print it and hang it on the side of your computer, just in case you feel the need to ask me these questions AGAIN! .