Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (113562)	1/25/2008 10:36:54 AM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

"Why did it seem credible if you haven't researched the specific claims.? " Quite simply because the article gave substantial information about the complaints. You know and I know that if any of that information had been false, people like you ... well not like you because you never argue rationally ... but rational people who support clinton and want to defend him would have spent millions to expose any fraud contained in the allegations. They would have done so in an immediate and overwhelming fashion. They didn't and that speaks for itself. "Doesn't simple logic tell that if those claims were credible criminal charges would have been the product." No. Charges for what? "Doesn't it embarrass you that your Christians are behind such slanderous and despicable charges? " It says something about the organization of the Christian right if it was in fact they were behind it as you claim. The organization claiming responsibility is 'Citizen's Video Press' and 'Citizens for Honest Government' narrated by law enforcement officers and other credible citizens like a State Senator and State Supreme Court Justice, government representatives who had palled around with Clinton, etc. The usual smattering of people who have their own credibility and those who were in his inner circle who know the clinton machine and have witnessed his charming aversions to the truth. The use of the word 'Honest' in their organization's name probably offends you but it isn't normally considered a religious word. I didn't see any evidence of a religious agenda involved what so ever. "Your apparent belief in such trash says a lot about your morals and religion. Which trash, which morals, what religion? "And you are dead wrong when you say those despicable claims have not been discounted." "such slanderous and despicable charges? Which were slander? What was despicable? Really, by credible and honorable persons such as yourself no doubt, links please?