Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (368749)	1/28/2008 1:39:19 AM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573849

Z, > It's not so much that they don't want people to, say, relieve medical care, but they just want to make sure that they're not paying for it, and they'd rather the person suffer or die than have to pay taxes. Same thing with schools, wages... I don't equate "not paying for it" with "actively trying to keep people from receiving medical care." Tenchusatsu

To: SilentZ who wrote (368749)	1/28/2008 12:36:02 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573849

>The current abortion on demand of terminating pregnancies by ignoring the slaughter of unborn children is birth control. It may be a woman's choice, a few may be medically necessary, but it is still very wrong. To you. And you should be helping make damn sure that people like me who think that abortion is OK aren't winning elections... When did you say again that you believe killing a child is murder and when it is not? Can you narrow it down to a week or two? And do we add that it depends who is doing the "terminating"?