Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (110846)	1/28/2008 8:44:53 PM
From: Freedom Fighter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

KT, Given that there isn't a viable candidate that holds my strong view that our major economic problem is the flawed domestic and global monetary system, as is usually the case I am looking for the least bad alternatives. I could live with a Romney vs. Obama election. Even though Obama is foolish enough to think government can solve long term problems without creating even bigger ones, he's bright, charismatic, seems to have some integrity and his last name is not Clinton. So he's not a leading candidate to be the anti-Christ. It's hard for me to find any redeeming qualities among the republicans (except Paul) other than they are less foolish about long term economic matters. In this specific case, the only thing I like about Romney is that he's not McCain. It's pretty clear to me that McCain is a clueless old fart that should be in a retirement home. He's the embodiment of most of the things wrong with Washington. He's an idiot. Paul asked him a question at one the debates and he babbled endlessly because he didn't even understand the question.