Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (16419)	1/29/2008 1:59:09 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25737

"One would think so, but the clintons prove your theory wrong..." Really? (I think not....) Didn't public opposition rise fairly fast after Clinton's election? (And weren't his national elections minority wins?) (And, didn't his post-Impeachment rebound in the polls happen only as the public became even more turned off by the spectacle of other pandering, bloviating, 'slick-suit' politicians? I mean, after all, nothing happens in a total vacuum. There are ALWAYS new and 'even better' contenders for the role of 'lying politician' and the public's well-warranted disgust. <g>) I think, all things considered, that the principle holds up fairly well.... (PS --- aren't Hillary Clinton's negative poll numbers hovering around the 50% mark now --- just as they have been, fairly consistently, for many years now?)