SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (4121)1/29/2008 4:27:49 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 42652
 
Yes, from what I know about mammograms (and I admit I'm not expert) it does seem dumb to pass them up to save $12, that is unless they are offered so frequently that your reaching the point of diminishing returns. (Once a year? great, once every six months? maybe too much, once every month, almost definitely too much, might do more harm than good). But I don't think these people where passing up mammograms because they got one last month.

Also its not just the $12. The screening rate for people with free mammograms is only 8% higher (the article didn't give the exact rates, but it seems clear that its nothing like 92% for $12, and 100% for free, probably not even close)



To: Lane3 who wrote (4121)2/3/2008 12:35:14 AM
From: Joe NYC  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
Lane,

I was amazed that any woman would be dumb enough to pass up a nearly free mammogram.

Choosing not to submit oneself to needless radiation is not as dumb as you think.

Joe