Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TheBusDriver who wrote (56256)	2/1/2008 1:55:58 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78419

gqc.v - another little ratchet step coming off bottom ... think Goldquest has better near-term prospects than the average sick puppy i'm following lately ... belongs in the Kootenay/Condor class imho - geo-run, multiple projects carefully chosen, cost-effective high-impact exploration, and with major backing in their case Gold off sixteen bucks, silver downticked eight cents - that's the ratio narrowing ggc.to - [got to remember it's .to not .v now] - at one point the other day best bid was 2.55, that's pretty cheap for what they've accomplished, if i had any left i sure wouldn't sell them now ... all silvers way down, but then, if it makes you feel any better, compare them with the zincs, lol bmc.v - finally back past where my wife re-bought ... these guys deserve better too, nickel may be out of fashion but they're making money at it, hedges long gone now and the fold theory is bearing out mr.to/mrb - still no response to el Morro fease, that's amazing, it's like it never happened