SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Peter Dierks who wrote (25523)2/1/2008 11:51:15 AM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
Not just that but the idea that the US government would face a hit on its credit rating because the current level of deficits is rather silly. They are higher than I'd like but they are pretty normal, actually below the average since 1970, and lower than many other wealthy countries (both as a percentage of GDP, nominal dollars is a fairly useless measure)



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (25523)2/1/2008 11:53:03 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 71588
 
He 'tried' in a very brain-dead manner.

He should have reformed the tax codes FIRST (as many of his advisers suggested) and put forward some of the excellent ideas for a simplified tax system that his own tax panel suggested.

That way, when the tax over-haul was enacted... we would clearly know what the budget was like, and what would be available for reform/overhaul of social programs....

INSTEAD, he wimped out... when with minor (and, unfortunately: complicating) tax changes... after (instead of before) flopping with his politically tone deaf social program recommendations.

Thus: nothing substantive accomplished, a great opportunity for serious and comprehensive tax system reform and simplification lost, opportunity for transfer program changes lost... and then he went on to make matters even worse with his dilatory spending.

Brain-dead, and foolish. Extremely long-term Harmful.