Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (237025)	2/1/2008 2:25:46 PM
From: Paul Smith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794157

Ann Coulter I have a couple thoughts on that. 1) Ann Coulter seems to intentionally say things designed to attract press to herself and has intentioanlly cultivated (IMO) a sensational image. 2) IF Coulter actually was active for Hillary in the Fall, her ratings would tank and it would destroy her career. Democrats will never embrace Ms. Coulter.

To: goldworldnet who wrote (237025)	2/1/2008 4:33:29 PM
From: ManyMoose	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 794157

Coulter just lost my confidence. NOBODY BUT NOBODY IS BADDER FOR THIS COUNTRY THAN HILLARY CLINTON.

To: goldworldnet who wrote (237025)	2/1/2008 4:47:21 PM
From: Glenn Petersen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794157

I tuned out Anne Coulter years ago. Her over the top rhetoric is an embarrassment for those principled conservatives who are not consumed with shamelessly exploiting their soap boxes for cheap financial gain. February 1, 2008 Has Ann Coulter Finally Jumped The Shark? By Ed Morrissey She did for me last year at CPAC, of course, when she derided John Edwards as a "faggot". At the time, a number of conservative bloggers wrote that she had embarrassed the movement and owed Edwards an apology, which she refused to offer. This year, the ACU has opted not to have her as a featured speaker, although I understand she will appear at an ancillary event at CPAC. Of course, she can then explain why she will campaign for Hillary Clinton if John McCain wins the Republican nomination: So let's walk through the logic here. John McCain gets castigated by Coulter because he aligns himself too often with the Democrats. Her solution to that is --- to campaign for the Democrats? Maybe someone can explain the thought process to me, but it sounds like a hysterical demand for extortion rather than a considered and thoughtful political position. I'm supporting Mitt Romney because I think he is the better option. If Mitt doesn't win the nomination, I plan to support John McCain. He will have won the support of more of the party, and that would make him the man to carry the banner. I will still oppose some of his policy stands and acknowledge his apparent animus at times to the party base, but he will still be a much better choice for the nation than Hillary Clinton. It appears Coulter hates McCain more than she cares about conservative values. She has acquired McCain Derangement Syndrome, and is rather obviously unbalanced by it. Sean Hannity was clearly embarrassed to listen to this tirade, and Coulter should have been embarrassed to have indulged in it. captainsquartersblog.com