Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jackjc who wrote (56265)	2/1/2008 4:42:03 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78421

It was a bit disappointing to see such a muted reaction to 10Dec news from Promontorio, but long-run we may be better off, having not generated hard feelings from a more wicked retrace like some others have gone through As of last spring Jim McD was seeing indications of possible huge extent, geofizz showing 'maybe a mile or better' out from the old pit, correlation of old data and maybe extrapolation of same may have come into it, along with sampling and general observation ... but knowledge of the prospects goes back way before - there was a reason they put out the considerable time and energy to nail down this particular property, and over ten years ago War Eagle knew they had something when they held it, they just couldn't get financed in the metals bear JJ still a going concern too, last results unexciting but there is much more to it ... hard to say why Connor Creek is so slow to come in, i highly doubt that management wants it that way, at the same time i'll bet they don't want to pay extra to get driller and lab priority, that would violate the principle of cost-effectiveness without enduring benefit - if the metal's there it'll still be there in a few weeks