SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: neolib who wrote (47705)2/2/2008 3:27:16 PM
From: Lane3  Respond to of 541403
 
When you have meet a few 30 year olds on disability because of obesity, and realise that they now sit and do nothing while collecting a paycheck for life, it kind of irritates me.

Look on the bright side. They won't live long...



To: neolib who wrote (47705)2/2/2008 3:33:11 PM
From: Rambi  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541403
 
Yep- you're right- balancing is very difficult.

It irritates me to see a lot of behaviors that others indulge in which could wind up costing the taxpayer money down the road... reckless driving, drinking, smoking, irresponsible sex or pregnancy... this is just the nature of the beast (us being the beast).

IMO, though, trying to control behaviors in this way is like having an extremely punitive authoritarian parent. Much better to do what you suggest. For instance, a lot of insurance companies have started rewarding healthy habits - exercise, weightloss- by lowering premiums.
Good example of positive reinforcement v punishment, koan and mary!



To: neolib who wrote (47705)2/2/2008 3:35:54 PM
From: epicure  Respond to of 541403
 
Do you remember the funny Simpsons' episode on that? Homer found out he could work at home if he was classified as obese. It was pretty much spot on for this conversation.

I agree with you that benefits need to be linked to education.