SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (16671)2/3/2008 3:51:46 PM
From: pompsander  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 25737
 
Re: "It appears the Republican Party has drifted far to the left..."

So... what was the Bush's fiscal liberalism?

It sure wasn't 'conservative' anything
______________________________________

As many have tried to point out the past few years, George W. Bush is not a conservative. Never has been. He talked like one back in 2000, but it didn't last for six months. Then the Republican congress and the republican president went on a "big government" spree that is still just amazing in hindsight...all funded (or unfunded) by deficits, which really means by other nations willing to buy that debt. Some of those nations are not our friends...so what kind of stupidity is that?

And yet people still want their medicare drug programs, their fat agricultural subsidies, their bridges to nowhere (Ted Stevens, what a total ass), and no republican said much...McCain tried a few times, on spending, but it didn't hold.

Bush's veto pen was nowhere to be seen. Now he dares to talk about fiscal responsibility while still wanting tax cuts as deficits soar and the chance to curb spending was four years ago!

Ron Paul...please.



To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (16671)2/3/2008 5:18:24 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25737
 
Your point is irrelevant, I'm not defending Bush here, I'm talking about the entire Republican party, Bush is among them...

GZ