SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: quehubo who wrote (47802)2/3/2008 9:46:25 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541674
 
I presume you were aware that link connected to a chart that showed, once again, what the years of Rep rule since 1980 have done to annual deficits and the national debt.

Definitely not a good case for Rep fiscal responsibility.



To: quehubo who wrote (47802)2/3/2008 10:43:44 PM
From: Dale Baker  Respond to of 541674
 
Keeping the debt flat while fighting a war is not so bad.

If you spend more than you make every single year for decades, would you call the accumulated debt "not so bad"? Or would see yourself as a wretched borrow-and-spend addict utterly dependent on the good graces of your loan sharks?

Watching Middle Wast wealth funds buy up chunks of US banks with preferred stock at exorbitant interest rates is a few steps beyond humiliating.

It's going to get a lot worse - as far from "not so bad" as you get in my book.

Deficits do matter.



To: quehubo who wrote (47802)2/3/2008 11:26:11 PM
From: Sam  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541674
 
Perhaps the situation is not so bad. Keeping the debt flat while fighting a war is not so bad.

zfacts.com

I think you need to look at that chart more closely. It is only "flat" if you ignore the Clinton years, when it when down. It is up by quite a bit it you actually acknowledge that they existed.

But, then, I guess you would prefer to ignore the Clinton years.