Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neolib who wrote (20042)	2/4/2008 4:19:17 AM
From: elmatador	Respond to of 36918

If forest was good, people would pay to preserve it. turning trees into tradable securities. Ready for the payoff: To save a forest: World eyes grand plan of payoffs to preserve trees, protect climate iht.com

To: neolib who wrote (20042)	2/4/2008 11:06:13 AM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 36918

dear neolib AKA ear2earfeces, your post admits to your lies and your stupidity. Because one or several ideas are posted at a particular site in your mind are incorrect, therefore all ideas are judged incorrect or crap. The EE Richard Petschaue has posted a fully self contained clear explation using very generic interpretations of accepted science principles. The construction of logic and reason and clear meaning in EE Richard Petschaue's PDF junkscience.com make it obvious only lying sacks of ship would propose expending trillions of dollars in useless technology and methods. As a lying ignorant sack of ship you refuse to read and discover how stupid and ignorant your positions are and as a coward do not want to know they are delusional. So neolib AKA ear2earfeces the thread lying sack of shit why don't you read it and argue some science rather than posting lies and lies and lies.