Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (25694)	2/4/2008 5:14:14 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

Believe the excerpt I quoted (from your remarks) was even LARGER: Small deficits can be endless without problem. Deficits that grow slower than the economy (with spending and interest costs also growing slower) are not problems. Endless large deficits are a problem, and a negative thing, but one that can be dealt with. We are worse off because of them, but its not a disaster. Endless massive deficits would be a major problem and probably eventually a disaster (or at least a crisis followed by the end of the deficits, but if they where truly endless it would be a disaster). Message 24281951 (Pretty hard to get away with calling that 'selective'. <g>)