Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LTK007 who wrote (356442)	2/5/2008 2:12:54 PM
From: Bid Buster	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

This has always been an anti guru thread, most here like you are smart enough to know 99.9% of the so called gurus are just those with low self esteem looking for attention. Everyone else is a clown and they didn't read the thread header.

To: LTK007 who wrote (356442)	2/5/2008 2:31:43 PM
From: Horgad	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

You have to hang around here a while to figure out this thread. So much of what is said is tongue in cheek that it must be bewildering to a new comer to try and figure how some of the posters really feel about something. (I've been reading for a while and I still get lost in the subtleties sometimes.) To put my post into context: Pokersam is used laughingly or not so laughingly as a contrary indicator. IE he is wrong so often that you should do the opposite of what he does to make money. So I was pointing out that he was correct for a change and how strange that is...hopefully it was just a fluke. It is scary when the gurus starting making correct calls. In any case, you won't get banned for being anti-guru. I might though for giving away too many thread secrets. Also it is safe to take everything that Box says at face value. He never bends the truth, but watch out for the other posters. <g>