Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (370121)	2/6/2008 1:11:19 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573092

Gore obviously wanted to avoid the debacle that his last endorsement was (endorsing Dean almost on the eve of the screech). Maybe he voted too long. I think Gore's endorsement would have counted more than any other endorsement Obama got so far. And because it didn't come before Super Tuesday, Hillary is walking away with more delegates than she would have, had Gore endored Obama before Super Tuesday. Clearly, the Kennedy endorsement was worthless.

To: Joe NYC who wrote (370121)	2/6/2008 2:10:31 AM
From: SilentZ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573092

>I don't believe that. Hillary must be ahead of the earned delegates, because she won much bigger states. Then, there are of course the Super Delegates, and she has an edge on those. I've seen several projections now, and not one has the two of them separated by much. A big part of that is that Hillary will get essentially nothing in Illinois because Obama beat her by like 40 points there. Chuck Todd of MSNBC has Obama actually taking the night, 841 to 837: msnbc.msn.com On to March 4th (Ohio and Texas). -Z