Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Honey_Bee who wrote (34408)	2/7/2008 10:55:11 PM
From: Math Junkie	Respond to of 42834

It's pretty easy to infer that when a person as dedicated as you to the subject of discussion doesn't back up her statements with facts, then it's VERY likely that the person doesn't have the facts needed to do so.

To: Honey_Bee who wrote (34408)	2/8/2008 8:01:00 PM
From: octavian	Respond to of 42834

honeybee asked: <<Octavian, what do you mean "real reason." Are you saying I wasn't being truthful? Surely you don't profess to being a mind-reader...>> --No. You said "why should I bother" to name people (or even say how you know there was as many as a single one) who were hurt by brinker's qqq call. The real reason you don't want to "bother" is because you don't know of a single person who was hurt by the QQQ call. Is that being untruthful? You tell ME. Personally, I think it's just debating on your part. You neglect to answer the questions that would put your side in a bad light. I don't do that and neither does math. That is because neither of us has an agenda. .