Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (25895)	2/8/2008 7:20:01 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

Same original question: Does that exclude* sovereign (foreign) ownership in it's definition of 'the public'????????* What part of "nothing else is excluded, do you not understand? I've answered the question three times. Are you being deliberately obtuse? Once again " I said that it excludes money that the government owes itself and nothing else. If it excludes nothing else, than it includes sovereign foreign ownership of debt by definition. Like I said: EVERY decade has plenty of 'incidents'. When was the last storm that was as damaging to the US as Katrina? When was the last terrorist incident that was as damaging as 9/11? Every decade has plenty of incidents, but many don't have a single incident this large in the US. They (The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office... Non-partisan hardly means "having correct opinions". It may have been 'opinion' in 2002 when they were predicted results... but that has long been supplanted by the ACTUAL RESULTS of history The higher deficits are clear objective actual results. Harm to the economy is much more complex than higher deficits. Its still opinion. As they predicted: all net benefits to the national economy produced from Bush's modest tinkering with the tax codes have become overcome Assumes facts not in evidence.