Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greenspirit who wrote (20216)	2/10/2008 7:01:48 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36917

I'm at least honest enough to admit that error. Good for you, that is better than most do. I try to do the same myself. However, it is clear he supports the information regarding Global Warming on the site, including all the graphs and charts I posted earlier. A truth you will now demonstrate zero honesty in stating openly. I have no problem with agreeing that he supports that. He has a long history of doing so. Unfortunately, he is not very credible, despite the early good work he did in his career. When he got in bed with the Tobacco companies, and Steve Malloy, he kind of went down hill wrt to objective science. That was 30 years ago. I have zero problem with any good science, even it if completely overturns AGW. It is just I don't see much at all in that direction. If it turns out that good data and theories start proving it is the Sun, or something else, AND can explain why all the good science so far has shown otherwise, why would you think I would have a problem with it? I've posted quite a few times that I fully expect humans in the future to regulate the climate to avoid ice ages. In order for us to do that, we need the best science possible. It will get there independent of the likes of Steve Malloy or Seitz.