SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Spansion Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Woerns who wrote (3325)2/11/2008 11:44:02 AM
From: Pam  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4590
 
So it's rather 50% cost-per-bit reduction than reduction in size. I'd like to know the previous technology node to compare with. Is it 65nm Strataflash?

65nm to 45nm would give approximately a 50% reduction in die size and that results in a 50% reduction in cost/bit. Generally, they do not make smaller die's, they double the capacity for the same size die. So yes, I think they are comparing the new 45nm NOR part with a 65nm NOR part.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News