Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (25992)	2/11/2008 6:51:28 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 71588

Saint Wal-Mart? well, let's look at the record We might also think about the Nobel Peace Prize when we consider the retail giant's contributions to society canada.com austrianeconomists.typepad.com (But considering the record of Nobel Peace Prize winners, would such an award be an insult to Walmart?)

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (25992)	2/11/2008 11:20:08 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Respond to of 71588

"...twisting the context of the comment." Not at all! My comments ALL ALONG referred to BOTH spending AND taxes. That was the 'jist' of ALL of them, because those were the twin focuses of all of those budget analysis which I began my posts by referring to! So, I have been totally consistent all along --- despite repeated efforts to 'put words in my mouth' that were never mine, or to hijack the discussion off to some different focus, some fantasy land where SPENDING does not exist. :-) And, PS... you never answered the question, Peter: Do you know of ANY government budgets which don't* include both revenue and spending?????????????* (I think not....)