Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: yaetmo who wrote (34476)	2/12/2008 12:07:50 AM
From: yaetmo	Respond to of 42834

Octavian, that poster at the sewer only has a one day old ID. IMO, posters like that are just like a bird fly by dropping some....

To: yaetmo who wrote (34476)	2/12/2008 7:57:58 PM
From: octavian	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

yaetmo said: <<First off, I should bill you $175/hr for research, plus expenses for cleaning after sloshing through the sewer posts. --OK. Thanks yaetmo. I know it IS a lot of work getting through the piglet's posts. But you should be thankful that newslettercheat was still MIA (he has 4 questions that he is trying to avoid answering), otherwise it would have been REAL slow-going! <<You totally missed what the quote was about.>> --I did? What did I miss? << Add to that the sewer reporter of the quote never verified by reading the original post because the post matching the topic was #572, not #575. That looks like Kirk's fat finger, not the sewer poster's.>> --Yaetmo my friend, there could be a lot of reasons for that. For one thing, maybe kirk deleted some pro-brinker posts. Maybe he read the UTEK post and then deleted his OWN post. <<The gist of the quoted post relates to a "bottoming" chart Kirk posted on his blog 10 hrs earlier in the day. The quoted text really came from #925 of 'the Brinker thread', not ‘Kirk’s market thoughts . In the quote, the "HE" implies Brinker, not Kirk. Additionally the quote is not exact.>> --The UTEK poster indicated kirk said Brinker got the idea to issue a new buy signal from kirk's blog. If that is not true, I guess I owe kirk an apology. But no one can rightfully blame me or the UTEK poster for drawing a wrong conclusion (if we actually did draw a wrong conclusion), because kirk has done that very thing on several previous occasions. Next time, though, I will check for myself before I take another poster's word for something posted on kirk's board. That is, assuming I CAN check. I'm not sure if I can read kirk's blog without registering and being approved by the head censor.