SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: neolib who wrote (20298)2/13/2008 11:48:36 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Respond to of 36917
 
one again neolib AKA ear2earfeces is wearing his blatant lies hat.

As testified too under oath and never contradicted.

Mann and budies are fools who do not comprehend statistics. Mann and budies suck big time at reviewing scientific writings LOL...
Wegman testimony...
In general, we found the writing in MBH98 and MBH99 to be somewhat obscure and incomplete and the criticisms by MM03/05a/05b to be valid. The reasons for setting 1902-1995 as the calibration period presented in the narrative of MBH98 sounds plausible, and the error may be easily overlooked by someone not trained in statistical methodology. We note that there is no evidence that Dr. Mann or any of the other authors in paleoclimate studies have had significant interactions with mainstream statisticians.

GROSS cross mutual masturbation of the mind by fools leading fools.

We found that at least 43 authors have direct ties to Dr. Mann by virtue of coauthored papers with him. Our findings from this analysis suggest that authors in the area of this relatively narrow field of paleoclimate studies are closely connected. Dr. Mann has an unusually large reach in terms of influence and in particular Drs. Jones, Bradley, Hughes, Briffa, Rutherford and Osborn.

Because of these close connections, independent studies may not be as independent as they might appear on the surface. Although we have no direct data on the functioning of peer review within the paleoclimate community, but with 35 years of experience with peer review in both journals as well as evaluation of research proposals, peer review may not have been as independent as would generally be desirable.
[ 420 ] > grep Wegman aaa-goodlinks
energycommerce.house.gov -O Wegman.critiqueofMannHockeyStickGarbage.pdf



To: neolib who wrote (20298)2/13/2008 12:38:41 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36917
 
I believe the MWP was warmer than now. That clearly doesn't jibe with Mann.