SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: wbmw who wrote (247746)2/13/2008 4:35:39 PM
From: muzosiRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
i think he understands that the theory exists but it just doesn't apply here. one indication is that it doesn't is the asp difference between desktop/server parts and notebook parts. intel's notebook asp has always been higher and even when amd introduced competitive parts for desktop/server that didn't change. i think it's clear that when amd doesn't have competitive parts intel can command a higher price regardless of price elasticity or business cycle or any other reason than if amd competed. if amd stops competing for any reason intel's asps will go much higher overall. claiming that this won't happen is not intellectually honest. at least some people here (doug and shm) are not advocating that but waiting for it to happen.



To: wbmw who wrote (247746)2/13/2008 5:49:53 PM
From: gvattyRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Wbmw, the theory exists, but it doesn't work with a monopoly. What you don't understand is that elasticity doesn't matter to a pure monopoly. The monopoly can dictate the demand. The monopoly can make 10,000 units of an item and charge $1 per unit to gross $10,000, or it can make 1,000 units and charge $10 per unit to make the $10,000.