Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (4520)	2/14/2008 9:33:08 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42652

" I'm saying it hasn't been proven to be correct (at least not by them, at least not in what they present in that article). In order to make this claim I would be expected to either show holes in their data, or holes in their logic. To show holes in their data, I could come up with better data, showing theirs is wrong. Or I could point out flaws in their methodology (which wouldn't prove their data wrong, but would mean it isn't established as being correct). Those would both have been valid methods to counter their argument, but I used a third method. I showed how their data doesn't lead to their conclusion." You can't show flaws in their methodology....you're not qualified unless you can show your own bona fides which you haven't done. And you only think you showed how their data doesn't lead to their conclusion....... You can't hide behind pretension too long.....