SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let’s Talk About Our Feelings about the Let’s Talk About Our -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: average joe who wrote (4604)2/14/2008 6:15:34 PM
From: Tom Clarke  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5290
 
Six things that "everyone knows" about the Middle Ages that aren't true.

1. In the Middle Ages everyone believed the earth was flat.

The shape of the earth has been known since antiquity and the knowledge wasn't lost in the Middle Ages. It was a scholarly exercise to prove mathematically that the earth was round. However, in Western Europe it was believed that, as one approached the equator, it became too hot for people to survive. Therefore there was much speculation on what, if anything, existed in the antipodes.

2. The Middle Ages were "a thousand years without a bath."

Soap was invented in the so-called Dark Ages. And it was used. Every town of any size had a bath house and people washed hands and face before and after meals. The bath houses weren't closed until the plague years through fear of contagion, although some places closed them earlier because they were such popular sites for assignations. But people still bathed. Foregoing washing was one of the penances people took on to atone for sins.

3. In the Middle Ages the lord of the manor had the right of the 'first night' with any bride from the estate.

Dream on! Braveheart notwithstanding, the jus primae noctis never existed. Certainly there was rape and pillage; there still is. But it was never legally sanctioned. Any lord who tried to pull something like that would die mysteriously soon after. I suspect this was invented by some eighteenth-century nerd, longing for the good old days.

4. The Middle Ages were dark and superstitious. No one thought rationally and every bad thing was blamed on witches, who were burnt.

People in the Middle Ages were no more superstitious than today. Some people believed in astrology, some thought it was rot. Medicine was often given with prayers and other rituals. It isn't now? The majority of witch burnings, or in the case of America, hangings, were done in the 17th and 18 centuries, the time known as the Enlightenment.

5. Women in the Middle Ages had no rights and no voice.

Would you like to tell that to Eleanor of Aquitaine, Chritine de Pisan, Hildegard of Bingen, Marie de France? There were many things that women weren't allowed to do until late in this century but, in the early and high Middle Ages women had control of much of their own property and, especially in the towns, worked alongside their fathers and husbands and even took over for them in all trades. They also defended their castles. One of the virtues of the trebuchet was that it didn't need upper body strength to set off and women could use it effectively. Starting in the thirteenth century women's rights were slowly eroded. The main things women couldn't do were be priests and government officials. (This is really a ten-week course. I'm happy to lecture to anyone who'll listen.)

6. The "Church" controlled the minds and lives of everyone in the Middle Ages.

Atheism was uncommon in the Middle Ages. Almost everyone in western Europe would define themselves as being Christian, Moslem or Jewish. But within each of these there were hundreds of permutations of personal belief. The popes, though they tried, had little success in telling people what to think about anything. There were certainly trials for heresy and someone seemed to be constantly excommunicating someone else. But the fact that people lived quite comfortably for years under interdict shows that it wasn't the terrible punishment the bishops would have liked it to be.

Another site has been created by by Stephen J. Harris, at Loyola University-Chicago, devoted to misconceptions about the Middle Ages : It can be found here. There are links from this site to other medieval sites as well.

James Franklin in the School of Mathematics at the University of New South Wales has also created a website entitled Myths About the Middle Ages which also contains links to other related sites.

The point of this exercise is that this period wasn't the monolithic static society that many of us were taught about. The Middle Ages are an invention of a later time. Despite what Hollywood may have told you, I can say with absolute certainty that no one ever roused the troops by shouting, "Men of the Middle Ages!" The period of history was as complex and diverse as any other and I hope that my books reflect all the variety of the time.

sharannewman.com



To: average joe who wrote (4604)2/16/2008 2:15:37 PM
From: Tom Clarke  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 5290
 
Quebec's French-language watchdog investigates Irish pub
Last Updated: Saturday, February 16, 2008 | 8:29 AM ET
The Canadian Press

It appears a few pints of beer won't be sufficient to douse the latest language tensions brewing in Montreal.

This time, Quebec's language watchdog is frothing over a popular watering hole cluttered with classic Irish signage and English-only posters.

The owner of a Montreal Irish pub received a letter from Quebec's French-language office complaining about the use of English signs inside.The owner of a Montreal Irish pub received a letter from Quebec's French-language office complaining about the use of English signs inside.
(Ian Barrett/Canadian Press)

The wall hangings at McKibbin's Irish Pub include vintage advertisements for Guinness and Harp as well as other traditional fare like Palethorpes Pork Pies.

The owners of the popular hangout say it all just adds to the charm and ambience of their downtown establishment.

Still, the Office québécois de la langue française says complaints about the English-only signs, an English-only chalkboard menu and English-only service prompted it to send the pub owners a letter demanding answers.

"What we asked them were what measures would be taken to ensure that service would be offered in French, because we received two complaints," Gerald Paquette, a spokesman for the language watchdog, said in an interview Friday.

"If the business says some of those pictures are decorative to give the pub an Irish flavour, it is certain we would exempt them," Paquette said. "But there were other posters also, notably ones about contests and events, that were in English only."

The brewhaha has prompted the pub's co-owners to extend an invite to Quebec Premier Jean Charest to stop by for a hearty meal and a pint and inspect the signs himself.

Dean Laderoute and Rick Fon said they'll remove the posters if Charest believes they violate Quebec's language laws, which require French to be predominant on most commercial signs.

"An Irish pub without these decorations is just an empty box," Fon said in an interview. "It's the decor, the pictures, the clutter — it creates the warmth."

Fon also said they have bilingual menus and that his regulars, including a considerable French clientele, all agree the complaints are ridiculous.

"It makes no sense. It's silly," regular Suzette L'Abbé said.

"The staff, if not French-speaking to begin with, get by in French," L'Abbé added.

The pub could face fines as high as $1,500 for each infraction.

The pub skirmish is the latest battle over the question of whether there is enough French spoken in downtown Montreal.

The ever-bubbling issue of language has resurfaced in recent months, beginning with a report in the newspaper Le Journal de Montreal about the ease of obtaining employment downtown with a limited knowledge of French.

Other controversies have included the language of instruction for tots in daycare and the use of English on the automated call-answering systems of Quebec government departments.

The debate promises to get even more heated next month when the language watchdog releases a study on language trends in the province.

The watchdog's Paquette says McKibbin's has 30 days to come up with answers, and if the issue goes farther, a legal warning would be sent and Quebec's attorney general would decide on penalties and fines.

English-rights activist Gary Shapiro believes the whole language pot started stirring again with the provincially appointed commission on so-called reasonable-accommodation and has been fuelled since by politicians and a small group of malcontents.

"It's basic harassment," Shapiro said. "Are they going to come into our homes and our bedrooms next? Where is it going to end?"

Here are some other cases over the years that have attracted the interest of the language watchdog or people seeking to protect the French language:

1996: A woman warns the owner of a Quebec pet store she might get in touch with language authorities because Peekaboo, the parrot she wanted to buy, didn't speak French.

1999: The Old Navy chain is asked to rename its stores "La Vieille Rivière." It never happens.

2000: The owner of an Indian restaurant is told he's breaking the law by having coasters for "Double Diamond," a British beer.

2001: Some people express disappointment that race-car driver Jacques Villeneuve calls his restaurant "Newtown."

2005: Language authorities say they will investigate complaints that Montreal Mayor Gerald Tremblay's party used the word "Go" on its posters and pamphlets, as in "Go Montreal."

2007: Imperial Oil says it will keep its Quebec-only "Marché Express" name for its Esso gas stations after protests against a proposal to change the name to "On the Run," as they are known elsewhere in North America.

2007: About 50 people protest outside a Second Cup outlet to demonstrate against the words "Les cafés" being dropped from "Les cafés Second Cup" at some of the chain's outlets.

2007: Language activists decry that callers to many Quebec government offices are told to "press nine" for English before instructions are delivered in French. Some of the departments have since changed the message to put English at the end.

cbc.ca



To: average joe who wrote (4604)2/23/2008 10:19:34 AM
From: Tom Clarke  Respond to of 5290
 
Possible Druid Grave Enchants Archaeologists

By Angelika Franz

Druids belong to the realm of myth -- archaeologists have never been able to prove their existence. But now researchers in England have uncovered the grave of a powerful, ancient healer. Was he a druid?

There's a joke among archaeologists: Two of their kind, in the future, find a present-day public toilet. "We've discovered a holy site!" cries one. "Look, it has two separate entrances," says the other. "This here," he says, pointing to the door with a pictogram of a woman, "was for priests. This is evident by the figure wearing a long garment.

The joke rests on a perennial sore point for archaeologists: There are things they simply can't prove. The list includes love, hate, fear, desire and, well, faith. Which hasn't stopped many reports from being written about who loved or hated whom in ancient cultures -- who was threatened by what, who tried to win something else.

Philip Crummy is an archaeologist who tries not to pass off ancient toilets for holy sites. But lately the director of the Colchester Archaeological Trust has been pulling a number of artifacts from the ground near the site of an ancient city, Camulodunum, that would tempt any archaeologist to speculate, at least a little. Crummy has stumbled upon a small cemetery about 4.5 kilometers (2.8 miles) southwest of present-day Colchester. The dead were all buried between the years 40 and 60 AD. For a cemetery that's a short lifespan; but in Britain it's an important period, because in the year 43 AD the island became a Roman colony.

The people buried in this graveyard clearly belonged to the elite of their day. They were laid to rest not in caskets, but in large burial chambers. On the east side of the chambers lay piles of shards -- remnants of pottery shattered on purpose at the site. The immediate impulse is to imagine a funeral feast where the bereaved shattered plates against a wall. "Careful," warns Crummy. "We can't know what happened there exactly."

This find is unusually rich. One dead body was interred with a ball of verdigris, either for medicinal or cosmetic purposes. A small Roman flagon of perfume from Augustan times was also in the chamber. But the funeral items weren't just for superficial things: Another grave had an inkpot. A literary man, we might think, but Crummy recommends caution again. In archaeology an inkpot is just an inkpot. After all nothing would prevent an illiterate from shoving Shakespeare's collected works up on his living-room shelf today.

Scalpels, Saws, Hooks, Needles, Tweezers

One of the graves is especially evocative. It probably belonged to a doctor. The interior resembles that of a soldier in a neighboring grave. At least in the eastern part where an eleven-piece dinner set lay, as well as a copper sieve, which had been used to pour out wormwood tea, and a bronze pan for warming up wine.

In the western half, archaeologists found a board game. The stones were once laid out along the broad sides of a board -- 13 white and 13 blue. The wooden board had rotted away long ago, but the stones had hardly moved over two thousand years. The ancient undertakers had meticulously piled the burned bones of the deceased on the board. There was also a set of surgical instruments, complete with scalpels, saws, hooks, needles and tweezers -- as well as divining rods made of iron and copper. "Doctor" is the term that Philip Crummy has prudently chosen for the dead person, but less cautious researchers would have chosen another word: "druid." That would have been a sensation.

Druids are problematic, because no one has proved their existence, at least not archaeologically, although they have been written about extensively, even by ancient writers. Today most people would think automatically of Miraculix, the druid in the proto-French village defended by Asterix (and other cartoon Gauls) who buck themselves up with magical drinks. The Asterix cartoonists, René Goscinny and Albert Uderzo, took descriptions by the Roman historian Pliny the Elder (23-79 AD) as a template. Pliny's writing describes the "druid" caste as white-robed, with golden sickles which they used to cut branches of mistletoe from oaks.

That all sounds very nice, and Pliny is even known to have travelled extensively in the colonized provinces. But he was a Roman, and scholars have always treated Roman descriptions of the world with caution.

What Exactly Was a Druid?

Archaeologists have never found a golden sickle and Caesar never mentioned the precious tool in his "Gallic Wars", the second major historical source of research on druids. In Book 6, Chapter 13 he describes the task of druids: They "are engaged in things sacred, conduct the public and the private sacrifices, and interpret all matters of religion. (...) they determine respecting almost all controversies, public and private." Not a word about white gowns, golden sickles, mistletoe or oak trees. But Caesar's account has to be taken with a note of caution -- he was, after all, a conqueror writing about the vanquished.

So what history tells us about the druids is barely usable. And the more recent extensive literature isn't much help either. Mike Pitts, an expert on druids and the author of an article on the Colchester site in British Archaeology magazine, told SPIEGEL ONLINE that the 19th and early 20th centuries saw the emergence of a notion of druidry that completely distorted the real picture. Stonehenge and Merlin have about as much to do with druids as the Asterix and Obelix comic books of Goscinny and Uderzo. "That's exactly the problem," says Pitts. "Despite the many fantasy stories, we don't even know what we're supposed to be looking for."

No Longer Celtic, Not Yet Roman

This is where the Colchester burial site comes in. The doctor of Camulodunum was evidently a rich and respected man. If one assumes that the surgical instruments and divining rods in his tomb weren't just for decorative purposes, healing and soothsaying must have been part of his job description. It's the closest anyone is likely to get to a druid in archaeological terms. Crummy is aware of this, of course. "We know nothing about the dead person. Anything is possible. We don't even know whether the bones belonged to a man or a woman."

For him other questions are far more exciting. "What we're seeing here are the tombs of an elite that ruled when the Romans came to Britain," says Crummy. The artifacts placed in the tombs reflect that the elite was in a cultural transition -- not entirely Celtic anymore, but not wholly Roman either. The set of surgical instruments is similar to other sets found along the Mediterranean. But the instruments have individual designs that are different from their Mediterranean versions. "What was the relationship between these people and the Roman occupiers?" asks Crummy.

"They witnessed with their own eyes how Emperor Claudius rode into Camulodunum at the head of his own army," speculates Mike Pitt. "And there's some probability that they knew Cunobelinus." He was king of the Britons before the Romans came, and he was the inspiration for a mythical figure. William Shakespeare turned him into Cymbeline, the main character of his eponymous tragicomedy.

[some great photos at the link]

spiegel.de