Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (20433)	2/17/2008 9:53:46 AM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 36921

The fact of that site is that it is suppositions about supposition. Those who comprehend what a supposition is know the fact my above statement is true. And no one has audited the suppositions pro or con as to any reality of fact or truth. Setting up the first lie or fart to fool the stupid. "The most commonly cited study by skeptics is a study by scientists from Finland and Germany " I don't recall ever seeing that study and since your site starts right off with a lie, do I believe they are reporting what that study really said. Or do we have just another selective reporting of information to fool the generic stupid. Fact, the output of the sun warms the earth. The cooling of the earth is from energy leaving the earth in the form of photons that are emitted following the laws that govern black body radiation. The fundamental laws of physics as to the if of global warming being driven by CO2 is a question of what impact a ppm of CO2 in the atmosphere changes conduction, and convection and how that impacts advection in the the atmosphere and the ocean. I cannot comprehend how the cumulative effects of CO2 properties can cause the supposed global warming. Now you say that anyone can understand the arguments presented at your site. And I agree with you that the stupid can be fooled by the bla bla presented as arguments at you site of science law. ROTFLOL, do you believe the analysis of the first argument supposing the sun is the main culprit in global warming has been addressed and explained away? Something is preventing me from thinking...