SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (29628)2/19/2008 2:02:40 AM
From: Elroy Jetson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217546
 
Urea is a petrochemical.

Urea is produced from ammonia and carbon dioxide. Ammonia in turn is produced from hydrogen, from natural gas or crude oil off-gases created during the refining process - at least since the 1908 Haber process was invented -, and combined with nitrogen extracted from the air through compression and separation.

So in this way farmers using Urea for fertilizer are competing with other users of natural gas and crude oil, whether this is feedstock for plastics or an electric power plant, gasoline or diesel fuel, or urea for clean diesel combustion.

Ammonia plants are easy to construct, so there's no bottleneck. It would primarily mean that retail diesel stations need to install urea dispensers as you find in Europe.
.



To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (29628)6/25/2008 2:01:57 PM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 217546
 
Plants need nitrogen to grow. That nitrogen has to be in a chemical form, such as ammonia, that plants can process. Some plants have made a deal with different kinds of bacteria that can take nitrogen out of the air and turn it into ammonia. The bacteria get a home on the plant roots. In exchange, the plants get the nitrogen fertilizer. This relationship is called nitrogen fixation. Legumes do it. So do some trees.

Nitrogen-fixing plants have an advantage over other plants in nitrogen-poor soils. The problem is that nitrogen fixation is a “gas guzzler” – plants that use it burn a lot of energy. That’s a fair trade-off in poor soil, but it’s a disadvantage in soils already nitrogen rich. In lakes and oceans, nitrogen-fixers are less abundant in nitrogen-poor soils than in rich circumstances. But in forests, it’s the opposite. Nitrogen-poor temperate forests are short on nitrogen-fixing trees. Nitrogen-rich tropical forests have them in abundance.

features.csmonitor.com



To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (29628)6/28/2008 9:03:48 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 217546
 
The Fertilizer for Food Sweet Deal Between Brazilians and Arabs

Brazil currently imports 70% of the fertilizers it consumes, especially potassium (90%), phosphates and nitrogen compounds. Arab countries, in turn, import 90% of the foodstuffs required to meet their populations' needs. Each side has what the other side needs.

In order to solve this equation, Brazil is negotiating, with Arab producer countries, tariff preference and regular export deals for commodities - beef, chicken meat, soy, coffee and fruit - in exchange for fertilizers, which would be regularly supplied by that region of the world.

Such regular exports would take place in addition to what the Arabs already buy from Brazil, and prices would be lower than those in the international market. The same would happen with regard to additional imports, by Brazil, of fertilizers manufactured in the Arab world.

This operation, the 21st Century Barter, is presumably being discussed by the Lula administration with Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Syria, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates. These are the world's leading producer countries of raw material for fertilizer manufacturing.

Exchange relations are regarded, both by Brazil and the Arab countries, as extremely important and complementary for both sides. The Arabs will have a regular, trustworthy source of foodstuffs at their disposal, and Brazil, on the other hand, will count on a stable, regular supplier of fertilizers in the short, medium and long term.

Should the operation come to fruition, the forecast is for the country to be able to partly reduce its expenditure on fertilizer imports. That, in turn, will certainly contribute to reduce food prices in the country. It is worth noting that fertilizers, depending on the product, account for 15% to 30% of production costs for Brazilian farmers.

For the market, Barter 21 is a clear indicator that relations between developing countries have evolved. They are already capable of analyzing the areas in which one economy complements another, and seeking solutions that do not depend on the mood of wealthy nations - whose only goal is to export their products to developing countries, while imposing tariff barriers on whatever they import from what they call the Third World.

Checkmate

Besides the agreement with the Arabs, Brazil wants to increase its domestic production of fertilizers. In order to pressure the private initiative towards investing, the minister of Agriculture, Reinhold Stephanes, has moved a pawn on the board.

First off, he explained that the fertilizer costs, along with the growing demand, constitutes the main contributing factor to rising food prices, which are driving inflation up. Then, he put his message across: he stated that as fertilizers currently answer to almost 40% of total production cost and have become cause for concern, the government might intervene in the sector.

"In principle, we want our mines to be explored. However, (the Brazilian state-owned oil company) Petrobras will obviously need to step in if necessary. And if that is the case, then we are going to act as well. We might even transfer control of some sectors back to the government," said Stephanes.

Coincidentally or not, private enterprises have begun to announce investment aimed at increasing fertilizer production. In late May, for example, the mighty Bunge informed that it will inject 3.2 billion Brazilian reais (US$ 1.9 billion) into four new projects for expanding phosphorus supply to the domestic market.

In one of these projects, at a potassium nitrate mine located in the municipality of Patrocínio (southeastern Brazilian state of Minas Gerais), the multinational corporation should invest 2 billion reais (US$ 1.2 billion). Vale do Rio Doce has also announced investment in the sector.

Petrobras plans to build new fertilizer manufacturing units in the country as a response to strong demand for the product, and should get back to tendering the potassium reserves it owns in the Amazon, and for which it did not find buyers in previous attempts. By 2010, the state-owned enterprise should invest in a factory of nitrogen-based fertilizers.

Pole Position

Even before the minister issued his warning, 15 agricultural cooperatives in the Union and Organization of Cooperatives of the State of Paraná (Ocepar) were already discussing the implementation of a fertilizer mixing plant in the city of Paranaguá (South Brazil), where the second largest port in Brazil is located.

The location is strategic and logistical, as the same truck that transports soy to the port can drive back carrying fertilizers. This will reduce transport costs and, consequently, the final cost of agricultural production.

Presently, agricultural cooperatives in the state of Paraná import 1.8 million tons of the 2 million they consume annually. Just to give an idea, the fertilizer market in the state of Paraná, which answers to nearly 25% of national grain production, has an annual turnover of approximately US$ 2 billion.

This year, the combined foreign net assets of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) member states - Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Oman - should total US$ 2 trillion, representing growth of US$ 200 billion over last year, according to a report disclosed recently by the Institute for International Finance (IIF), based in Washington D.C.

By 2012, the GCC's total foreign assets should reach almost US$ 7 trillion, according to another survey conducted by consultancy firm McKinsey, also based in the United States.

Financial System

A significant share of that amount should be poured into the international financial system and direct investment in the United States, Europe and Asia. Nevertheless, the Arab region should receive more funds than ever before. Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Morocco and Tunisia should be the main beneficiaries, as well as the banking, telecommunications, real estate, tourism, construction and infrastructure sectors.

Assuming an average price of US$ 50 per barrel of oil, McKinsey claims that the six GCC member states should invest US$ 1.5 trillion abroad until 2012, the equivalent to approximately US$ 1 billion per day. By 2020, according to a report published by the Global Institute at McKinsey, the value may total US$ 3.5 trillion, increasing the region's total foreign wealth to US$ 8.3 trillion.

"If oil were to average US$ 70 a barrel, the outflows would rise to an average of about US$ 628 billion a year, implying new petrodollar investments of nearly US$ 2 billion a day," predicts the survey by McKinsey.

Even if oil prices declined to $30 a barrel, the GCC's foreign assets would reach some US$ 4.8 trillion by 2012. In a worst case scenario, the consultants add, even if the GCC states never invested another dollar abroad, the returns on their existing foreign assets would produce $1.6 trillion by 2022, making the GCC, along with China, one of the world's largest sources of surplus capital.

Anba - www.anba.com.br