Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greenspirit who wrote (20527)	2/19/2008 10:35:54 PM
From: Peter Dierks	Respond to of 36921

Great polls: newsbusters.org newsbusters.org I guess we must start calling the adherents of the cult of manmade global warming, Climate Alarmists (or perhaps Warm Mongers).

To: greenspirit who wrote (20527)	2/20/2008 12:25:49 AM
From: neolib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36921

The UN is most unlikely to solve AGW. The Bush administration has inadvertently done quite well at setting things in motion by the misadventures in the ME and $100/B oil (despite Dick Cheney, that bastion of anti-environmentalism claiming oil would be what , $30/B or $20/B or some such nonsense prior to Gulf II). This was much better than any environmentalist such as Al Gore could have done, since those inclined to yap about environmentalists wrecking the economy, tend to also yap with delight about the WOT. Everyone is happy this way. Even all those economists who claimed that doubling or tripling our energy cost would just destroy life as we know it. Turns out their models must have been a little off. The only way the UN would have a prayer of taking over the world is if the US screws up so badly on AGW that a significant fraction of the earth's population is in dire straights. Myself, I don't see that.