SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sam who wrote (50284)2/23/2008 7:04:39 PM
From: Lane3  Respond to of 541915
 
I didn't mean to cause a fracas. I simply searched for and found something that looked credible re the financing of nuclear power plants. A simple "thank you" would have sufficed. <g>



To: Sam who wrote (50284)2/23/2008 9:10:16 PM
From: Bearcatbob  Respond to of 541915
 
"In any case, if a nuclear plant has a safety accident, it is ipso facto a disaster."

No it is not. First - what is a safety accident? Next - the plants are designed for containment. Chernobyl was not. I submit the above statement is unnecessarily alarmist and not objective.



To: Sam who wrote (50284)2/26/2008 2:53:23 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 541915
 
Many--probably most--large projects of this sort have cost overruns.

Which doesn't address the issue of government regulation stalling further nuclear plant development.

In any case, if a nuclear plant has a safety accident, it is ipso facto a disaster.

Incidents that get reported as accidents or safety incidents typically are far short of disasters.

Know anyone who has taken a vacation to Chernobyl in the past 20 something years?

Chernobyl didn't have a containment vessel. It was a disaster, but it was also something very different than American nuclear plants which have released a lot less radiation in to the environment than our burning of coal has.

It wasn't some place you would want to take a vacation to even before the accident, and maybe you can't visit the plant itself even now, but its safe to go in to a large part of the evacuated area. I've seen TV shows from it, and the measured radiation levels where not a problem (at least not for a visit, I'm not sure that you could live there). None of which means it wasn't a disaster. It was, but if it was an American plant it wouldn't have been.