SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: steve harris who wrote (371823)2/24/2008 6:43:39 PM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1586778
 
It's not the left concluding anything. It's scientists the world round. Your politics are clouding your judgement. BTW, one thing you are right about is that CO2 levels have swung way up and way down over the various geological periods of our earth's history. There were periods when oxygen levels were extremely high and that lead to gigantism among creatures now known as dinosaurs. In other periods such as the Carbonaceous period, the earth was considered to be CO2 impoverished, as it is today. The truth is that the earth does go through many cycles of CO2 levels. Another unfortunate truth is that humans can only live in a narrow band of CO2 levels. If they get too high, it leads to warming and air mixtures beyond which the earth can support human life. Two things we know for sure is that the climate warming and CO2 are statistically correlated and that human activity is causing an acceleration in the increase in CO2 levels. If we continue down this path, we will most certainly increase CO2 levels beyond which we can live in. It probably won't be in our lifetimes, but it could be in our children's or grandchildren's lifetimes. I hope we either learn to control CO2 levels or have colonized other worlds by then, or we will be done as a species.

You don't have to believe it, but science tells us these things are 95% probable, given all the evidence available from ocean change observations, ice cores samples, tree growth analysis, air samples, geologic studies, etc etc. The only folks that don't believe the science now are those that are simply too ignorant or too lazy to read over the scientific consensus.