SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : $2 or higher gas - Can ethanol make a comeback? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: richardred who wrote (2623)2/24/2008 8:14:17 PM
From: richardred  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2801
 
Energy Bill Becomes Law

Posted on: Sunday, 24 February 2008, 03:00 CST

By Parkinson, Gerald

In December, President George W. Bush signed the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, an omnibus energy-policy law designed to enhance energy security through expanded use of renewable energy, energy savings and increased efficiency. Its three key provisions are changes to the renewable fuel standard (RFS), tighter corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards, and appliance and lighting efficiency standards. It also gives a boost to energy research and development, as well as carbon capture and sequestration. The bill extends and revises the RFS set by the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which requires minimum levels of renewable materials in U.S. transportation fuel. The previous standard was 5.4 billion gal in 2008, rising to 7.5 billion gal in 2012. The new bill starts at 9.0 billion gal in 2008 and increases to 36 bilhon gal in 2022. Beginning in 2016, the RFS target will be met using 15 billion gal of conventional biofuels, while the remainder must be advanced biofuels, i.e., cellulosa ethanol and other biofuels derived from feedstock other than corn starch. The administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has the authority to temporarily waive part of the biofuels mandate if it is determined that a significant renewable feedstock disruption or other market circumstance might occur.

Renewable fuels produced from new biorefineries will be required to yield at least a 20% reduction in the Hfecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions relative to emissions from gasoline and diesel.

The biofuels infrastructure will get a boost from the legislation, which authorizes grants for research, development and demonstration (RD&D), as well as commercial applications of biofuels. Among the research areas to be studied are: the feasibility of algae as a biofuels feedstock, of constructing dedicated ethanol pipelines, and of using higher percentages of ethanol in fuel blends; the conversion of existing corn-based ethanol plants to produce cellulosic biofuels; and the adequacy of rail transportation for delivery of ethanol fuel. A university- based program for R&D on renewable energy technologies will give priority to schools in low-income and rural communities with proximity to trees dying of disease or insect infestation.

Environmental safeguards included in the bill continue the Clean Air Act's prohibition against the introduction of new fuels or fuel additives into commerce unless a waiver is granted by the EPA. Previously, if the agency failed to act within 180 days of receiving a request, the waiver was treated as granted. Now, new fuels and additives may be introduced only if the EPA explicitly grants a waiver, and it has 270 days to take action.

The new law requires a restructuring of the vehicle fuel-economy program. A single CAFE standard applicable to passenger cars and light trucks has been set at 35 mpg by model year 2020, and interim standards will apply beginning with model year 2011. Standards for "work trucks" and commercial medium- and heavy-duty on-highway vehicles will also be developed.

The standards will be based on vehicle attributes and expressed in the form of a mathematical function. Manufacturers will have to come within 92% of the standard for a given model year. They can earn credits for exceeding the standards in one vehicle class to offset, within limitations, the CAFE of a different vehicle class that is falling short of compliance, and tiiey can buy credits from and sell credits to other manufacturers. CAFE credits for producing flexible-fuel vehicles (FFV) will be phased out by model year 2020.

Improving energy efficiency

Energy efficiency, particularly as related to appliances and lighting, is an important focus of the legislation. The bill sets new efficiency standards for external power supplies, residential clothes washers, dishwashers, dehumidifiers, refrigerators and freezers, electric motors, and residential boilers, and allows the Dept. of Energy (DOE) to establish regional variations in standards for heating and air conditioning equipment. It also sets standards that increase the energy efficiency of lightbulbs by 30%, and effectively phases out most common types of incandescent lightbulbs by 2014.

The bill encourages the development of more energy-efficient "green" buildings through a zero-energy commercial buildings initiative. It sets a national goal to achieve zero-netenergy use for new commercial buildings built after 2025, and a further goal to retrofit all pre-2025 buildings for zero-net-energy use by 2050.

Federal buildings are subject to additional requirements. By 2015, they must reduce their total energy use, relative to 2005 levels, by 30%. New facilities and those undergoing major renovations must reduce fossilfuel use by 55%, relative to 2003 levels, by 2010, and eliminate fossil fuels altogether by 2030. Major replacements of installed equipment (e.g., heating and cooling systems), or renovations or expansions of existing space, must employ the most energyefficient designs, systems, equipment and controls that are lifecycle-costeffective. Federal agencies may not lease buildings that have not earned an EPA Energy Star label.

The law directs the DOE to conduct research on, develop and demonstrate new processes, technologies and operating practices to significantly improve the energy efficiency of equipment and processes used by energy-intensive industries. It directs the EPA to establish a recoverablewaste-energy inventory program, including an ongoing survey of all major industrial and large commercial combustion sources in the U.S.

Research and development

Provisions for accelerated research and development aim to expand the use of solar, geothermal, marine and hydrokinetic renewable energy, and to develop energy storage technologies for transportation and electric power. Various types of support are provided for accelerated R&D in such areas as: reducing the weight of motor vehicles to improve fuel efficiency without compromising passenger safety; developing advanced insulation with an R-value greater than R35 per inch; identifying replacements for 60-W incandescent lights and halogen lights; and developing a "twenty- first century lamp" that achieves certain output, efficiency and color targets. DOE will establish a cost-shared renewableenergy innovative manufacturing partnership program to support R&D on advanced manufacturing processes, materials and infrastructure for renewable energy technologies, including solar, wind, biomass, geothermal, energy storage, and fuel cell systems.

The bill expands DOE's program for carbon capture and sequestration R&D, which will include large-scale demonstration projects. Interdisciplinary graduate-degree programs emphasizing geologic sequestration science will be established, and a university- based R&D grant program will fund the study of carbon capture and sequestration using various types of coal.

Ethanol plants will become more common sights as fuel producers increase the amount of renewables in U.S. transportation fuel.

Copyright American Institute of Chemical Engineers Feb 2008
redorbit.com



To: richardred who wrote (2623)2/24/2008 8:15:15 PM
From: richardred  Respond to of 2801
 
Energy For a Changing World: A Credible European Energy Strategy for the 21st Century

Posted by Euan Mearns on February 24, 2008 - 12:54pm in The Oil Drum: Europe
Topic: Policy/Politics
Tags: alex salmond, bio fuels, brian wilson, co2 sequestration, energy efficiency, european commission, hydrogen fuel cells, peter vis, tritium (list all tags)

Google Technorati del.icio.us StumbleUpon

On Friday 22nd February, I attended the above conference in Aberdeen. With presentations from the EU Commission, The European Parliament, Scottish politicians and leading academics, this was a high profile event. There follows an account of the key issues raised by the various speakers together with my own observations and opinions on these matters.

Peter Vis

Peter is a member of the cabinet of Andris Piebalgs who is European Commissioner for Energy. He has particular responsibility for climate change targets, renewable energy and bio-fuels.....

Peter provided an overview of the EU framework for staged targets in CO2 reductions and reported on the progress being made by various countries in meeting these targets. I gather the UK is not doing so well. The core of EU energy policy centres on reducing CO2 emissions combined with attention to energy security. On paper they are admirable goals.

However, do actions match the rhetoric? Peter conceded that bio-fuels had recently received some bad press and I believe he said that the EU was intent on rehabilitating this tarnished image and would proceed with existing targets for bio-fuel production.

I believe he also said that bio-fuels have the capacity to reduce CO2 emissions by 80%. Somewhat misleading I believe? It may be the case that Brazilian sugar cane ethanol with eroei (energy return on energy invested) about 7, may deliver around 86% CO2 reduction. However, with temperate latitude bio-fuels where eroei may range from 1.2 to 2.5 the CO2 reductions are much lower – roughly 17% and 60% respectively (assuming that fossil fuels provide the energy of production). And so the key question is this. Are these reductions in CO2 worth the cost of changing land use, soil depletion and the threat of famine caused by converting our food supply into liquid fuels?

No doubt new enzymes and cellulosic ethanol may address some of these issues. However, why not promote the simplest and most energy efficient route of putting renewable electricity in a battery in an electric car instead?

Professor Jim McDonald Chairman of the Energy Technology Partnership

Professor McDonald gave an overview of energy research groups in Scotland focussing on Glasgow, Edinburgh and Aberdeen.

Hydrogen fuel cell research and CO2 sequestration were mentioned and since neither is to my mind an energy efficient way of dealing with energy decline these priorities leave me with a sense of frustration.

I hasten to add that using CO2 in miscible gas flooding of hydrocarbon reservoirs is a completely different matter and should be prioritised since the incremental increase in oil recovery adds to our national and energy security. There is a trade off between burying some CO2 at the expense of producing more fossil fuel energy that when combusted will produce more CO2. I sincerely hope therefore that a way is found to revive the currently dormant BP Miller – Boddam scheme.

In the discussion session I made the point that energy efficiency needs to be applied to energy production as well as energy use and Professor McDonald endorsed that point of view. Personally I would like to see energy efficiency as the guiding beacon of all Scottish and EU based energy initiatives.

Alyn Smith MEP

Whilst Alyn represents the Scottish National Party (SNP) at the European Parliament he dedicated part of his speech to criticising the administrative mess that the SNP government recently inherited at the Scottish parliament in Edinburgh citing the ability of small interest groups to block progress in new energy development projects.

Alyn is a full member of The Agriculture and Rural Development Committee of the European Parliament and is a substitute member of the Industry, Research and Energy Committee.

Alyn provided details of truly vast sums of money available for energy research and development projects within the EU and invited anyone or organisation looking for advice or assistance on such matters to contact him or his office.

I sensed a genuine desire to help so if you are looking for EU funding contact Alyn here.

Malcolm Webb CEO UK Oil & Gas

Malcolm observed that the European Oil and Gas industry accounts for most of the primary energy production within the EU, is the main provider of energy security and yet receives little attention within the EU energy strategy.

A curious paradox indeed which I suspect is related in part to declining oil production that will shortly be followed by gas and the need to replace these historic energy resources with something new.

However, I happen to agree with Malcolm that sustaining indigenous oil and gas production within the UK and EU should be a high priority and I personally would like to see the burden of taxation shifted away from the producers and on to the consumers. In this way the incentive to consume is minimised and the incentive to explore and produce is maximised. That is the path to energy security.

Very difficult to sell this to the electorate I know.

Jason Ormiston CEO Scottish Renewables

Jason provided an overview of the progress made in renewable energy developments within Scotland that was laced with a sense of frustration at the slow pace of development.

Those who have pursued and promoted renewable energy developments in Scotland are to be applauded. The reasons for the slow pace of development need to be identified and cleared away. I sense the new SNP administration is on the job.

Rt Honourable Brian Wilson, former UK Energy Minister

Now retired from politics, Brian Wilson is one of the UKs most experienced and knowledgeable politicians on energy matters.

Good will and good intentions were on prominent display at this conference and Brian rather laconically observed that this had been the case for decades and voiced a sense of frustration at the slow pace of progress in developing Scotland’s non fossil fuel based energy economy. He observed a gap between the rhetoric and the reality. “We are in the hands of destiny”.

In the discussion session I pointed out that the actual response of the UK to declining gas production had been to build pipeline links to Norway and 100 bcm per annum infrastructure for importing LNG. When the LNG cargoes do not arrive we will wish we’d done something different.

I share Brian’s sense of scepticism.

First Minister Alex Salmond

Alex Salmond is an economist, leader of The Scottish National Party and First Minister of the Scottish Parliament where he leads a minority administration with great skill. Throughout his political career Alex has worked tirelessly towards the goal of gaining full independence for Scotland.

Unfortunately I had to leave to pick up kids from school and missed the days keynote speaker. I gather he announced a new Green Energy institute would be built in Aberdeen – maybe I need to prepare a CV – I guess there is a first time for everything.

Euan Mearns BSc PhD
Editor The Oil Drum Europe
euan dot mearns at btinternet dot com

End note

The first question of the day came from a rather nervous student, who had just submitted his PhD, who asked why a space program was not part of the EU energy policy. He went on to explain that Planet Earth is short of H3 (tritium) which is more abundant on The Moon. Sustainability of the human race lay at the core of this question which I imagine was lost on the majority of speakers and delegates. The scarcity and importance of tritium to nuclear fusion reactors is discussed here.

Brian Wilson mentioned the vision of those who built Scotland's Hydro dams in the post-war years from which so much benefit has flowed. We once again require vision of this sort that stretches beyond where the next contract or research grant is coming from. I'd offer this student a job.

europe.theoildrum.com