Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MJ who wrote (240078)	2/27/2008 12:04:58 AM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793970

Fararo misses the big flick. If Hillary was a better woman candidate she would be winning. The fact is Obama has stronger emotional intelligence. You can see it in her body language, in the way she holds that long condescending closing of her eyes, and in the way she expresses victimhood. When a really good female candidate runs she will win based on merit. America is waiting for a women with the character, intelligence and experience to be President, she just isn't it. We have a country full of smart women with ambition. Someone else will run in the near future and win. Someone who doesn't have the baggage of Clinton. On the other hand, as compared to African Americans who have run for President, Obama is a smooth talking sharp debater and very good speaker. And his background is relatively clean. Compared to Jesse Jackson or Alan Keyes, his tone is more professional, serious and able to think through complex issues.