Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gg cox who wrote (5008)	2/27/2008 6:02:13 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42652

I went to the pool. Feels good to have gone. Hurt my foot, though. The good news is that I got in a full workout before the foot went. The non-contributers vastly outnumber the weasels. A whole lot cheaper to pay for the weasel outliers than to put half the country on the dole. You continue to focus on what is divisible. Because we were discussing the usage of "the commons," which is a function of whether something being indivisible, not on who pays. The correct usage of "the commons" is entirely separate from whether it's desirable or not to socialize health care. You can acknowledge the usage, you know, without giving up any ground on the health care issue. OT--" there would be less battlefields,fewer weasels" I was just discussing the usage of "less" and "fewer" on another thread and your phrase struck me. Why one of each?