SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Next President 2008 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (2317)2/28/2008 12:52:07 PM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 3215
 
He's gonna create a Dept Of Sharia Law with Farrakan as the Sec. of it.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (2317)2/28/2008 1:42:11 PM
From: JakeStraw  Respond to of 3215
 



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (2317)2/28/2008 7:58:34 PM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3215
 
Is Obama’s Life at Risk?
AMIL IMANI BLOG

In eloquent speeches presidential candidate Obama has made copious promises, understandably to attract voters. He talks about “change,” without really spelling out change from what to what. It just sounds good: “change.” A great sound bite, indeed. Change is exciting, while status quo is viewed as stagnant and boring. It is all part of the political game of telling people what they want to hear, getting elected, and worrying about delivering later.

The electorates are both short on memory and long on forgiving. So, the farce of empty high-sounding promises fills the air at campaign times. But there are instances that a promise during vote-gathering can later haunt the person. This may indeed be the case with at least one of Barack Hussein Obama’s promises.

Obama boasted that he would embark on a personal diplomacy to solve our foreign policy problems with countries such as Syria and Iran. He said that he would meet their leaders without any preconditions to settle our disputes. Doesn’t that sound like change, a real change of great relief to us all? Never mind the fact that he has about zero experience in foreign policy matters, he is foolish enough to aim to negotiate with the ever-conniving Assad of Syria and masters of deceptions such as the Mullahs of Iran.

Okay Obama, don’t claim that no one warned you. If you get elected President and you receive an invitation from your fellow Muslim brother Ahmadinejad to make good on your promise and visit him in Tehran for a tête-à-tête, don’t you do it. BBC’s recent report ought to be enough for you to recant your foolish and naïve promise:

“The European Union has criticized the new penal code being drafted in Iran, particularly a section that imposes the death penalty for giving up Islam...Death for apostasy already exists in Iran under Sharia or “Islamic - law.” But the changes would for the first time bring the punishment into the criminal code. An EU statement expressed deep concern about what it calls the ongoing deterioration in the human rights situation in Iran. It singled out Section Five of the draft penal code currently before the Iranian parliament, imposing the death penalty for apostasy. In the past, Iranian courts have handed down the death penalty in such cases, but have done so relying on Sharia law. If the draft is approved by parliament, the sentence will be formalized in the country's criminal code.”

Who is an apostate according to the legislation? Anyone in the world, not just Iranians, born to a Muslim parent; also, any convert to Islam who leaves it. Only one parent needs to be a Muslim at the time of conception for Islam to own that child for life. Islam is Ummehist. Islam doesn’t recognize nationalities and national boundaries. And these Islamist zealots are very serious and have no sense of humor. Some say they have no sense at all, and they may be right. What they certainly have is a thirst for blood, particularly for the blood of infidels and apostates.

My advice, Obama: Elected President or not, don’t you hazard a trip to the Islamic Republic of Iran. In fact, don’t you go anywhere near where the crazed Islamists can get their hands on you. You don’t even rate a fatwa from one of the many bloodthirsty crafty Ayatollahs or Moftis, asking for your head. Your fate is already sealed. You are on automatic, so to speak-- a person who was given the gift of Islam and who ungratefully turned his back to the one and only faith of Allah, so the Muslims believe. The punishment for this kind of betrayal is prescribed as haad (most severe), meaning death.

You may protest that you are free to choose your religion and that you have chosen to be Christian. Nothing doing! You are stamped as Muslim at conception because your father was Muslim. Further, you have been doubly-stamped by your middle name Hussein. Muslims name their sons Hussein in honor of one of Islam’s most revered saints. Hence, the Muslims want what is theirs and you either repent and return to the fold or prepare yourself for the ultimate punishment: Death.

The only time that these inveterate liar killers of Allah mean what they say is when they threaten violence and killing. So, please be careful. Stay close to home where a whole platoon of Secret Service at the taxpayers’ expense is shielding you from the thugs who would be just too happy to slash your throat while they joyously scream: Allah is the greatest. amilimani.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (2317)3/3/2008 12:22:11 AM
From: Hope Praytochange  Respond to of 3215
 
Nafta Bashing Ends at Texas Line
Clinton, Obama
Try to Avoid Pact
Before Key Primary
By AMY CHOZICK and NICK TIMIRAOS
March 3, 2008; Page A13

SAN ANTONIO -- After weeks of hammering the North American Free Trade Agreement on campaign stops in Ohio, the Democratic presidential candidates are singing a different tune in Texas.

Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have had to adjust their messages as they have shuffled between hard-hit Ohio and robust Texas, where Nafta is largely seen as an economic boost to the state's border communities.



Saturday, Sen. Clinton dedicated her stops in Fort Worth and Dallas to talk of national security. Friday, she focused a speech in Waco on veteran's rights, because Texas has a large military population. Sen. Obama is keeping his Texas message squarely set on uniting the country. He omitted mention of Nafta at a rally here Friday night that attracted 8,000 people.

Ohio and Texas may sit on opposite sides of the economic spectrum, but they are both must-win states for Sen. Clinton. The two states, along with Vermont and Rhode Island, go to the polls tomorrow and offer 370 delegates. After 11 straight losses, the Clinton campaign is hoping victories in Ohio and Texas can rejuvenate the candidate's diminishing chance at the party's nomination.

A Clinton Caravan

In mid-February, Sen. Clinton led by double-digits in Ohio and Texas. But the Obama campaign has eroded those leads. A Reuters/C-Span/Zogby poll of likely voters puts Sen. Clinton ahead by 1% in Ohio and behind Sen. Obama by 4% in Texas.

Yesterday, the Clinton campaign kicked off a traveling bus caravan during which the New York senator or her surrogates will visit 88 counties in Ohio.

Sen. Obama has been slowing down his schedule. The Illinois senator held two Ohio rallies yesterday.

Sen. Clinton trails Sen. Obama in the overall delegate count with 1,276 delegates to his 1,385, according to the Associated Press; 2,025 are needed to secure the nomination.

As Ohio voters express concern over the economy and a shrinking manufacturing segment, Texas has seen its energy sector boom, and a growing high-tech industry has brought new jobs to places like Austin.


Last year, Texas's 3.1% job growth was triple the nation's 1% growth rate and topped the state's historic average of 2.8% for the third year in a row, according to a report issued last week by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. Employment in the construction sector grew by 4.3%, while it fell by 2.9% nationally.

Shannon McCormick, 36 years old and an actor, attended an Obama event in Austin last week. When the talk turned to the economy, he shrugged. "Things haven't been so bad here," he said. "We're not losing jobs."

Ohio, meanwhile, posted a 6% unemployment rate in December, ahead of the national rate of 5%. Job growth in Cincinnati, for example, measured just 0.5%, compared with 1.7% for the nation beginning September 2006, largely because of the exodus of manufacturing jobs, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.

Ohio has also been much harder hit by the fallout of the subprime-mortgage crisis. Foreclosure filings in the state shot up 88% last year, while Texas saw foreclosure filings fall by 4.5%, according to RealtyTrac, a company that monitors housing.

In Ohio, Nafta has become the ultimate symbol of antiglobalization sentiment and is a constant source of contention between the two candidates. The agreement went into effect under President Bill Clinton in 1994 and created what remains the largest trade bloc in the world based on the combined gross domestic product of its member nations: the U.S., Canada and Mexico.

Sen. Obama has consistently criticized Sen. Clinton for supporting Nafta during her husband's administration. "The fact is, she was saying great things about Nafta until she started running for president," he said on a recent visit to a factory in Lorain.

At a speech in Nelsonville yesterday, Sen. Obama attacked Sen. Clinton's proposal to create a "time out" on trade agreements until they can be reviewed. "The world will not pause," Sen. Obama said. "China's not pausing. India's not pausing."

New Radio Ad

Sen. Clinton has fought back with a new radio ad in which unemployed blue-collar workers talk about how their jobs have been moved overseas.

"Hillary has gone on the record saying that Nafta was a mistake," a woman says. "She wants to change it from free trade to fair trade," another worker says.

But the towns along the Texas-Mexico border have a very different impression of the trade agreement. In the past decade, Laredo has gone from an impoverished backwater to one of the nation's largest inland ports. Its population has grown from 72,000 in the early 1990s to 250,000 in 2006.

Sen. Clinton pointed to the Nafta paradox after an event focused on poverty in Hanging Rock, Ohio. "I'm well aware that many parts of our country have different views about trade. I was in Laredo as I said last week, and it has greatly benefited from trade," she told reporters. "We need to maintain the positive aspects [of Nafta] but get very specific on what we are going to do to fix it."

Focus on Foreign Policy

Nafta briefly fell off the agenda Saturday when the candidates were campaigning through Texas. Sen. Clinton instead focused on criticizing Sen. Obama's amount of foreign-policy experience.

"His entire campaign is based on a speech he gave at an antiwar rally in 2002, and I give him credit for making that speech, but it was not followed up with action," Sen. Clinton told reporters on board the campaign plane from Dallas to San Antonio.

The Obama campaign has in response pointed to Sen. Clinton's vote to authorize the war in Iraq.

"Sen. Clinton is right when she says she's been tested on national security, but it is a test she has resoundingly failed," Obama spokesman Bill Burton said in a statement.

Write to Amy Chozick at amy.chozick@wsj.com and Nick Timiraos at nick.timiraos@wsj.com