SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Snowshoe who wrote (30100)2/28/2008 11:32:59 PM
From: Maurice Winn  Respond to of 217836
 
Snow, by leaving off the last half of the sentence I wrote, you completely changed the meaning of it, then asked me a question irrelevant to what I wrote.

<Why should the US subsidize Brazilian farmers? >

I can't think of a reason why USA citizens should do that. Can you? Have you ever heard of anyone outside Brazil who thinks that might be a good idea? [ElM not included]

You are probably right that the tariff is to offset subsidies for farmers or at least prevent competition from Brazil [from where I expect little ethanol is delivered to the USA]. I'll ask Google. ... I got sick of looking and wondered what the heck was I doing looking up ethanol 20 years after I got rid of the damn stuff [from my BP Oil alternative fuels days].

I don't really care what ethanol consumption is. It's trivial and just tax swindling political nonsense.

Mqurice



To: Snowshoe who wrote (30100)2/29/2008 2:59:24 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 217836
 
It is just buying a product at world market prices. Like any other product. We are the Wal Mart of the commodities. Unbeatble low prices.
Orange juice? USD700/ton tariff. Else we bankrupt FLA growers. It is the US citizen who is paying more for products to tranfer money to interest groups.

But higher prices now is ending all those distortions.