SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: neolib who wrote (51217)3/1/2008 6:58:40 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542914
 
Libertarian institutions (Cato, AEI, etc) also tend to doubt AGW....generally economists and business related fields in general, tend to doubt AGW

I think your use of the word "doubt" is off. Members of some of those groups may doubt but others are lobbying their interests. Not the same thing. "Deny" may be a better word.



To: neolib who wrote (51217)3/1/2008 7:05:44 PM
From: Bearcatbob  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 542914
 
Neolib,

I am an agnostic on whether or not GW is man made - I do not doubt that it has been warmer lately than when I was young.

My basic position is that if it is man made - then it will be. (If it is solar cycle made - then it will be.) The demographics of the world make it so. In saying this I am using the argument of the GW alarmists that the tipping point is supposedly near. If it is near there is absolutely nothing that can be done now. If it is not near - then the alarmists are just that - alarmists.

I see only nuclear power as a meaningful way to reduce CO2 emissions without crashing the economy. We can do all of the wind and solar stuff we want - if it saves energy from oil - then fine - but they will only impact around the edges.

The US population is growing. To accomodate the growth the economy must grow. Perhaps we can reduce the rate of energy consumption as a function of energy growth - but I find it essentially impossible to turn the battleship around in short notice.

Bob



To: neolib who wrote (51217)3/1/2008 8:14:02 PM
From: JohnM  Respond to of 542914
 
Terrific post, neolib. It would be, as you suggest, good to get some polling results.