SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mary Cluney who wrote (51237)3/1/2008 8:30:36 PM
From: Cogito  Respond to of 543975
 
>>Not that wikipedia is the last word in science, but the concept of sorting mankind into three distinct groups does not make any sense. It does not seem like it could be done.

I do not mean to say it is not useful when these terms are used to discuss generalities, but that is not science.<<

Mary -

Well, perhaps scientists have changed their minds since I learned about this. It does happen. What I read that paragraph from Wikipedia to say is that the differences are general, and apply only to broad groups, which overlap at the edges. Fair enough.

I have no interest in being able to definitively classify people by race. If there are no races, from a scientific viewpoint, then so be it.

- Allen



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (51237)3/1/2008 9:17:57 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 543975
 
, but the concept of sorting mankind into three distinct groups does not make any sense.

Very good data would back you up on this. Genetically, there is greater "distance" between groups within Africa, than there is between all the rest of us from each other. Oddly enough, the genetic differences between Chimp groups within Africa is similarly high.

Our eyeballs lead us to think otherwise...