Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : $2 or higher gas - Can ethanol make a comeback? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ish who wrote (2641)	3/2/2008 1:08:37 AM
From: richardred	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2801

sorry ISH it was a PDF file. Here's a snip ISSUE DEFINITION Despite Federal efforts last year to curb production and dispose of surpluses, record production and continued high carryover stock levels for most commodities have depressed farm prices and significantly increased expectea Federal outlays for agricultural price support programs. In an attempt to bring supply in line with demand, President Reagan announced on January 11, 1983, that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) would implement a payment-in-kind (PIK) program for the 1983 wheat, rice, corn, sorghum, and upland cotton crops. Recently, USDA announced a PIK program for the 1984 wheat crop. Under PIK, government payments in the form of Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC)-owned commodities are given to farmers in return for additional reductions in harvested acreage. At the time of implementation, the PIK program created a number of issues. Particular concerns included the potential short-term price impact of PIK, the more immediate problem of ironing out certain technical details, such as the taxing procedure, and the longer-term policy implications of initiating and maintaining such a massive supply control and acreage reduction program. Concern has been expressed over the eventual cost of the program and the impact it will have on retail fooA prices in 1984. In addition, heavy participation in PIK left the government short of stocks needed for payments, and the methods used for acquiring and distributing PIK commodities has prompted criticism from farmers and legislators alike. Furthermore, the program has come under increasing criticism SeCaUSe of the large payments that have been made to larger farmers. Some farmers are reported to have received payments valued in excess of $1 million. A recent legal interpretation by GAO concluded that payments in excess of $50,000 were a violation of Federal law. BACKGROUND AND POLICY ANALYSIS Supply and Demand Conditions Leading to PIK In 1981, U.S. farmers produced record levels of wheat, corn and soybeans.- However, both domestic and foreign demand for these commodities weakened over the marketing year, causing U.S. stocks for grains and cotton to swell. In an effort to reduce.supplies, the USDA implemented acreage reduction programs for grains and cotton in 1982. Despite these efforts, U.S. farmers harvested even larger crops of wheat, corn, and soybeans in 1982 than in 1981. The record production, plus a large carryover, dramatically increased stock levels of nearly all major commodities. USDA estimates that at the end of the 1982/83 marketing year, the United States holds approximately 73% of' the world's coarse grain stocks, 43% of its wheat stocks, 28% of global cotton stocks, and 65% of world soybean stocks. Demand for agricultural commodities has remained weak, with reduced domestic usage and declining export levels. For the first time since 1969, the value of U.S. farm exports has declined -- from $43.7 billion in 1981 to $39.1 billion in 1982 -- with a further drop to $34.5 b.illion in 1983. Large stock levels in the face of continuing weak demand depressed commodity prices and lowered farm income. Net farm income fell to only $22.1