Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Petz who wrote (248242)	3/3/2008 3:38:24 AM
From: wbmw	Respond to of 275872

Re: And if your numbers are intended to prove anything, why do they stop at 2002? I cared about debunking Dan's 1998-99 myth, along with giving some buffer space around it. Not every 10K has the same data, but feel free to go ahead and look up the rest. The important piece - R&D expenditure - has increased more or less continuously through the entire time horizon. The bottom line is that there is no correlation to back up Dan's claim that Intel has decreased their investments in new technology at the same time that AMD has had weaknesses in their product line. yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com Re: LOL, "Net investment in property plant and eqpt" is a bogus managed number, heavily influenced by non-cash items like the depreciation rate. That's your answer for everything on the balance sheet, Petz. What - are you going to say the same thing about R&D costs? Why not throw the entire SEC document into question, and have AMD add it to the lawsuit?