Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (5246)	3/3/2008 7:00:02 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42652

Description of Ad Hominem Translated from Latin to English, "Ad Hominem" means "against the man" or "against the person." An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument. Typically, this fallacy involves two steps. First, an attack against the character of person making the claim, her circumstances, or her actions is made (or the character, circumstances, or actions of the person reporting the claim). Second, this attack is taken to be evidence against the claim or argument the person in question is making (or presenting). This type of "argument" has the following form: 1. Person A makes claim X. 2. Person B makes an attack on person A. 3. Therefore A's claim is false. The reason why an Ad Hominem (of any kind) is a fallacy is that the character, circumstances, or actions of a person do not (in most cases) have a bearing on the truth or falsity of the claim being made (or the quality of the argument being made). Example of Ad Hominem 1. Bill: "I believe that abortion is morally wrong." Dave: "Of course you would say that, you're a priest." Bill: "What about the arguments I gave to support my position?" Dave: "Those don't count. Like I said, you're a priest, so you have to say that abortion is wrong. Further, you are just a lackey to the Pope, so I can't believe what you say." nizkor.org Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) - Cite This Source - Share This ad ho·mi·nem /æd 'h?m?n?m-?n?m, ?d-/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[ad hom-uh-nuhm-nem, ahd-] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation –adjective 1. appealing to one's prejudices, emotions, or special interests rather than to one's intellect or reason. 2. attacking an opponent's character rather than answering his argument. Compare ad feminam. ad hom·i·nem (hom'?-nem', -n?m) Pronunciation Key adj. Appealing to personal considerations rather than to logic or reason: Debaters should avoid ad hominem arguments that question their opponents' motives. WordNet - Cite This Source - Share This ad hominem adjective appealing to personal considerations (rather than to fact or reason); "ad hominem arguments" WordNet® 3.0, © 2006 by Princeton University. dictionary.reference.com

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (5246)	3/3/2008 7:04:22 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42652

Ad hominem fallacies take a number of different forms, though all share the fact that they attempt to re-focus attention, away from the argument made and onto the person making it. And remember--it doesn't really matter whether the terms of the attack are true or false. What matters is whether the argument is acceptable, not the person arguing it. After all, even if Adolf Hitler says so, 2 + 2 still equals 4. Among the most frequent ad hominem appeals are attacks on: * personality, traits, or identity: o "Are you going to agree with what that racist pig is saying?" o "Of course she's in favor of affirmative action. What do you expect from a black woman?" * affiliation, profession, or situation: o "What's the point of asking students whether they support raising tuition? They're always against any increase." o "Oh yeah, prison reform sounds great--until you realize that the man proposing it is himself an ex-con." * inconsistent actions, statements, or beliefs: o "How can you follow a doctor's advice if she doesn't follow it herself?" o "Sure, he says that today, but yesterday he said just the opposite." * source or association for ideas or support: o "Don't vote for that new initiative--it was written by the insurance lobby!" o "You can't possibly accept the findings of that study on smoking--it was paid for by the tobacco industry." The point is that each argument must be evaluated in its own right. Information or suspicions about vested interests, hidden agendas, predilections, or prejudices should, at most, make you more vigilant in your scrutiny of that argument--but they should not be allowed to influence its evaluation. Only in the case of opinions, expert and otherwise, where you must rely not on the argument or evidence being presented but on the judgment of someone else, may personal or background information be used to evaluate the ideas expressed. If, for example, a used car vendor tries to prove to you that the car in question is being offered at lower than the average or "blue book" price, you must ignore the fact that the vendor will profit from the sale, and evaluate the proof. If, on the other hand, that used car vendor says, "Trust me, this is a good deal," without further proofs or arguments, you are entitled to take into account the profit motive, the shady reputation of the profession, and anything else you deem to be relevant as a condition of "trust." sjsu.edu Also see fallacyfiles.org