Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : IDT *(idtc) following this new issue?* -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve Fancy who wrote (30834)	3/4/2008 2:00:50 AM
From: carreraspyder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30916

Steve, you never want to answer if are misdirecting in the first place. I can’t believe you did. I actually wish you were telling the truth, but you aren't. messages.finance.yahoo.com Re: NTOP reports March 9th after close. 25-Feb-05 02:57 pm astute, but what u still miss that everyone else get but hawaiicarrerasara and they handful crony is not matter potential. company not design benefit shareholder. jonass be there skim all fat off top. this proven. if all u look for $4 might get lucky. but not expect any more an probly not that. remember u think $8 last fall. look where is. there good reason that. good luck though SFANCY_99 messages.finance.yahoo.com Re: NTOP reports March 9th after close. 24-Feb-05 01:40 am astute, no get mad. but u start sound hawaiicarrera. that what she alway use post ahead earning when seem little early. earning alway suck anyway. me not remember when earning story ever good hear. u start sound nother desperate long grasp at anything. hope it work for u. but this flop. whybuynfloppy ** And I realize your whybuynfloppy profile is now locked off; but that doesn’t mean the posts can’t be retrieved. search.messages.yahoo.com aka, sfancy_99 ntoptruth wowo_carrera whybuyebay or repeatedly in your posts 'shiraz' whybuynflop whybuynfloppy maybebuynflop whybuyjonass voip_mike careraspyder thentoptruth stockmaaan itxc_bull ntop_delisted_soon hkchrisb whybuyjonass retired whybuynfloppy by: whybuyjonass 03/25/06 06:18 pm Msg: 236904 of 236905 an deleted. carrerahawaii like call periodic nick change multiple alias but all previous whybuy history. just like nflop. Re: IBAS is killing NTOP by: whybuynfloppy 11/08/04 02:22 am Msg: 101075 of 101078 hawaiicarrera, me shiraj. u got get over this name calling. per u i be many other people before u settle on latest diversion and recent scum scam tactic. Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha Re: hello by: stockmaaan 05/30/03 12:16 am Msg: 70935 of 70995 it all hawaiicon60 posting under 50 proven documented aliases. several self-admitted. rumor has it he on jonasss staff cause he been here making up bogus dd and posting outright lie for years for all jonasss stock. and he constant bash competitor itxc that jonassss want to buy. it all pretty clear if you do just little research. good luck! Posted as a reply to: Msg 70927 by merrittjohn002 Posted as a reply to: Msg 236502 by whybuynfloppy bruinmark1 Re: Re NTOP price...?/cariwang2 by: whybuynfloppy 01/18/06 04:53 pm Msg: 112639 of 112645 hahahhaahahaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahaha me never lie. an u not able post one. face it u huge nflop loser. that fact. sour grapes. hahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahaahhahahahahaha me shiraj. not u wet dream boy. Hahahahahahahahahahaahahahahaahaha what was it you said here – ... To: Smear From: Steve Monday, Sep 15, 2003 4:30 PM ...I don't post on Yahoo Smear and you know it. In the end, you'll be able to skip the apology, doesn't matter anymore. Let me just work through it: Those are your aliases. Then 83 aliases used by delusional, with 23 TOSes by Yahoo, until I believe Yahoo finally locked him out of posting at all. His aliases are exactly demonstrable as a separate related set. And wowo – 45 aliases bit before and after the purchase of Ntop by IDT (5 TOSes, but only as I saw them happen lately, and his initial wowwo aliaes, and his opttv alias. He’s big on gambling stocks, as well as bashing IDT .... His aliases are relatable as a separate related set.) once it is worked out, the rest is easier – S.I. Bob was right. People don’t post differently in their posts – but you have to know who they are in the first place. S.I. Bob said no one would post like that (making themselves look like they did -- the delusional posts). But he did, and Bob was looking at those. Imo he had some sort of dementia. So then another set, wowo; and another set, you. Your aliases became exactly demonstrable as a separate related set, but then you made the alias selection error, pulling up your name. 3 people, 155 aliases. Almost all aliases used in the bashing of NTOP. You went to the “ha ha ha” style, and short words, so you couldn’t be tracked using similar words in multiple aliases -- which you protested here. Misdirection. I could say it was you, and you could say it was not. But you pulled up your own (initial) Yahoo alias (above) selecting it by mistake, when you meant to respond to a post on Yahoo using your “whybuynfloppy” alias. so, I am sorry. and i wish you well ... but only as it doesn't relate to running what you could make your "past" manipulations ... but were involved in as late as January 2008. Ntop is gone. IDT is messed up, and has to work out what it is able to .... You don't like to be told it's you, so I don't expect you to stop. It's the "get em back, even though I got em first" thing you have. (the posts Steve made to astutetrader, were made to someone in the ntopprivateforum, who was long ntop, but would also bash ntop, and idt. He was capable of buying a huge position of a single issue --retired early, due to having a particular career and decisions in the dot.com market before the bust. He individually moved the share price in ntop, when buying and immediately selling -- but said he didn't. However, I watched it happy, and could work it out from his posts. I know via my own posts to him who he is. He doesn't have a problem with me -- he doesn't have a problem with straight posting; he does have a problem with Jonas. But because he was anti-Jonas, he was important to Steve, and so Steve tried to convince him of his own position at a time when astute when long and Steve was bashing... and then made the alias selection mistake in doing so. -- I had an advantage, besides very much wanting to know who was running all the deception -- as the co-moderator in the Yahoo group "ntopprivateforum", I knew who many of the aliases posting were.)