Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (22173)	3/6/2008 5:42:59 AM
From: tonto	Respond to of 224704

Before the 1995 Oklahoma bombing, Clinton was warned that a government building was to be bombed. Not one barricade was put up and of course the bombing was successful. Differentiate between the two for us... Clinton let it happen... Bush was warned about 9-11 and did absolutely nothing. The phony claim that he's kept us "safe" since then misses the obvious point. Ubnlike Clinton who stopped the 1999 LAX bombing by Al Qaida, Bush was warned but just let it happen. In fact during the 9-11 attacks, he sat reading grade-schoolers "My Pet Goat" with no sense or urgency. And his first priority was to make sure all his Saudi pals got out of the country without being interrogated by the FBI, even though evidence now proves the Saudi government knew about 9-11 before it happened and one of their reps was meeting with some of the hijackers. Also, didn't Bush let Bin Laden walk away at Tora Bora with that ridiculous cease fire? And didn't he say he doesn't care about Bin Laden anymore? And didn't the Bin Laden family invest many millions in Bush family ventures?